Search Results for "integrated activity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "integrated activity"

233 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 233 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.

3 Oct 2024

The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

10 May 2023

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

High Court

KAHC010000842011_1

11 Jul 2014

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.

11 Jul 2014

The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates batch of writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions challenge preliminary notification under Section 17(1)(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and final notification under Section 19(1), alleging procedural lapses in the formation of the layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposed of Batch Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout at Bangalore. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification under the BDA Act.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, who a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Coal India and Western Coalfields Against Temporary Injunction Restraining Cancellation of Letter of Assurance and Encashment of Bank Guarantee. The court held that the plaintiff had a prima facie case for breach of contract under the New Coal Distribution Policy 2007, and the balance of convenience favoured maintaining the status quo pending suit.

26 Jul 2011

The case arises from a dispute between Coal India Ltd. and Western Coalfields Ltd. (appellants) and Chintamani Agrotech (India) Ltd. (respondent/plain...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)