Search Results for "special conveyance allowance"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in ESI Act Case — Conveyance Allowance Excluded from Wages Under Section 2(22)(b). Conveyance allowance paid to employees for actual travel expenses is not 'wages' under the ESI Act, 1948, and no contribution is payable on such amount.

The appellant, Paramount Agencies Pvt. Ltd., a company covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, received a letter dated 31.01.1991 from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal, Setting Aside ESI Court Order on Conveyance Allowance as Wages. Conveyance Allowance Paid Uniformly to All Employees Regardless of Actual Expenditure Held to be Wages Under Section 2(22) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from an inspection by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation at the premises of M/s. Universal Medikit Pvt. Ltd., a company mark...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Upholds Inclusion of Salary Allowances in Income for Compensation Calculation Under Motor Vehicles Act. Court Holds That All Allowances Part of Pay Structure Are Includible and Compassionate Appointment Does Not Reduce Dependency Loss.

The appeal arose from a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award granting compensation of Rs. 50,75,000/- to the widow, minor son, and mother of one Haris...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Compensation in Land Acquisition References for MSRTC Bus Depot at Dahisar, Borivali. Comparable Land Sale Instances Analyzed to Fix Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

This matter involved a group of land acquisition references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by land owners whose properties ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Denying Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Sale Agreement. Recital of Possession in Agreement Not Conclusive When Only 15% Consideration Paid; Refund Admissible Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958.

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 19 March 2020, by which the petitioners agreed to purchase a flat in Karad, Satara for a total cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...