Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Travelling Allowance, Conveyance Allowance, and Holiday Encashment for Period of Alternative Duty. Petitioner, a Head Constable in Railway Protection Force, declared unfit for armed duty and assigned sedentary work, entitled to allowances for the period from 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 110
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sudhir Sambhaji Maldode, was appointed as a Constable in the Railway Protection Force on 17.04.1984 and later promoted to Head Constable. He met with an accident and underwent total hip replacement surgery. The Medical Authority of the respondents declared him unfit for armed force duty and recommended alternative sedentary employment by certificate dated 06.02.2010. On 08.02.2010, he resumed duty at RPF Outpost, Parbhani. On 09.02.2010, respondent No.4 directed him to report to the office of the Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF, Nanded. The petitioner was assigned alternative duty from 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013. He filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to pay travelling allowance, conveyance allowance, and holiday encashment for that period. The respondents opposed the petition, but the court, after hearing both sides, found that the petitioner was entitled to the allowances. The court noted that the petitioner was on duty and performing alternative work, and therefore, the allowances should be paid. The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to pay the amounts within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Allowances - Alternative Duty - Travelling Allowance, Conveyance Allowance, Holiday Encashment - Petitioner, a Head Constable in Railway Protection Force, was declared unfit for armed duty and assigned sedentary work - Court held that the petitioner is entitled to the allowances for the period of alternative duty from 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013 - Respondents directed to pay the amounts within four weeks (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to travelling allowance, conveyance allowance, and holiday encashment for the period he was on alternative duty from 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Respondents directed to pay travelling allowance, conveyance allowance, and holiday encashment to the petitioner for the period 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013 within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Entitlement to allowances during alternative duty
  • Travelling Allowance
  • Conveyance Allowance
  • Holiday Encashment
  • Railway Protection Force Rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (04) 13

WRIT PETITION NO.3831 OF 2014

2015-04-15

S.S.SHINDE, P.R.BORA

Mr. S.T.Shelke for Petitioner, Mr. P.G.Godhamgaonkar for Respondent Nos.1 to 4

Sudhir Sambhaji Maldode

South Central Railway, The Chief Security Commissioner, The Divisional Security Commissioner, The Assistant Sub-Inspector

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking payment of allowances for period of alternative duty

Remedy Sought

Directions to respondents to pay travelling allowance, conveyance allowance, and holiday encashment for the period 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013

Filing Reason

Petitioner was declared unfit for armed duty and assigned alternative sedentary work, but was not paid allowances for that period

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to travelling allowance, conveyance allowance, and holiday encashment for the period of alternative duty from 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was on duty and performing alternative work, hence entitled to allowances Respondents opposed the petition, but details of their arguments not mentioned

Ratio Decidendi

A petitioner who is on alternative duty due to medical unfitness is entitled to the same allowances as during regular duty, including travelling allowance, conveyance allowance, and holiday encashment.

Judgment Excerpts

By way of filing present Petition, the petitioner is seeking directions to the respondents to pay an amount of travelling allowance, conveyance allowance and holiday encashment to the petitioner of the period of 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.3831 of 2014 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad. The petition was reserved on 06.04.2015 and pronounced on 15.04.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Railway Protection Force Act, 1957:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition of Chinese National Seeking Visa Extension and Quashing of Leave India Notice. Petitioner Admitted Overstaying e-Visa Condition of 180 Days Continuous Stay, Court Declines to Interfere Under Foreigners Act, ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Inadequate Assessment of Permanent Disability and Future Prospects. The Court held that 60% disability of the lower limb translates to 30% whole body disability under the Work...