Search Results for "reopening accounts"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Full and True Disclosure Finding and Non-Disposal of Objections. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Alleged Under Section 147 First Proviso of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Crystal Pride Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its original return of income for Assessment Ye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Already Disclosed Loan Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Jainam Investments, a partnership firm engaged in trading of shares and securities, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Suspended Director in IL&FS Accounts Reopening Case — Recasting Permitted Under Section 130 Companies Act. Court holds that SFIO and ICAI reports provide sufficient basis for reopening accounts and that suspended director lacks locus standi.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Hari Sankaran, a suspended director of Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited (IL&FS), against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening and Agricultural Income Estimation Case. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held invalid for lack of tangible material, and Tribunal's reversal of CIT(A)'s agricultural income estimation set aside as perverse.

The appellant, Shri S L Basavaraj (HUF), an assessee, filed appeals against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 30 Januar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Debashu Services Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is a regular assessee under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Change of Opinion. Reassessment Notice and Order Quashed as Assessing Officer Had No Fresh Tangible Material to Justify Reopening.

The petitioner, Aroni Commercials Limited, challenged a notice dated 28 March 2013 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion and Audit Objection Held Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Lalitha Chem Industries Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing chemicals with units at Tarapur and Silvasa. For A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Venture Capital Fund — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Applicability of Section 10(23FB) Exemption is Invalid.

The petitioner, DHFL Venture Capital Fund, is a trust registered as a venture capital fund under SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations, 1996. It fil...