HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

High Court of Bombay Stayed Impugned Re-Assessment Proceedings Under Income Tax Act – Challenge to Section 148 Notice for AY 2009-2010. Petition Filed Against Order Rejecting Objections and Seeking Re-Opening of Assessment Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY

Admin

2026-08-24 03:06:35

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.2545 OF 2016

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 154

Writ Petition No.2545 of 2016

2025-04-25

M. S. Sonak, Jitendra Jain

2025:BHC-OS:6973-DB

Mr. Prakash Shah, Mr. Jas Sanghavi, Mr. Suresh Kumar

Macrotech Developers Limited (Successor to Suryakrupa Construction Private Limited)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-7(3), Mumbai and Others

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging re-assessment proceedings under Income Tax Act.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of re-assessment notice dated 30 March 2016 under Section 148 and order dated 28 September 2016 rejecting objections.

Filing Reason

Re-assessment notice issued for AY 2009-2010 and objections rejected by respondents.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 28 September 2016 rejecting Petitioner's objections to re-assessment.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule was granted in this matter on 30 November 2016 and the impugned proceedings were stayed. This petition challenges the re-assessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), dated 30 March 2016, seeking to reopen the assessment for the assessment year (AY) 2009-2010, and the order dated 28 September 2016 rejecting the objection.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.2545 of 2016 challenging re-assessment notice dated 30 March 2016 and order dated 28 September 2016. The High Court granted Rule on 30 November 2016 and stayed impugned proceedings.

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961: 148

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Arrest Order in BNSS and IT Act Case. Arrest Upheld as Police Complied with Mandatory Notice Under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Procedural Safeguards, Despite Petitione... 2026-09-09 15:49:42

Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Retired Army Officer's Appeal for Pension as Lt. Colonel (TS) with Costs. The court held that a valid promotion order not withdrawn entitles the officer to pension in that rank despite shortfall in reckonable service. 2026-09-09 15:49:42

High Court of Bombay Stayed Impugned Re-Assessment Proceedings Under Income Tax Act – Challenge to Section 148 Notice for AY 2009-2010. Petition Filed Against Order Rejecting Objections and Seeking Re-Opening of Assessment Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Filing Reason

Previous Decisions

Judgment Excerpts

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...