Search Results for "Captive Generating Plant"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Captive Generating Plant"

23 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Licensee, Holds Captive Users Not Liable for Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4) of Electricity Act, 2003. Captive generation and open access for self-consumption are statutory rights under Section 9, not requiring State Commission permission, thus additional surcharge is not leviable.

10 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (the distribution licensee) against the order of the Appellate Trib...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission’s 2016 Open Access Regulations. Balancing Grid Stability and Consumer Rights Under the Electricity Act, 2003

1 Apr 2025

Jurisdiction of RERC – Whether RERC could regulate inter-state open access under the Electricity Act, 2003. Held: Yes, as the Act empowers State ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.

3 Mar 2023

The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Using Open Access to Wheel Power to Its Own Units Is a 'Generating Company' Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That the Term 'Generating Company' Includes a Captive Generating Plant and That Disputes Arising from Open Access Agreements for Wheeling Power to Own Units Fall Within the Arbitral Jurisdiction of the State Commission.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Selection of Chief Engineer in Power Generation Corporation — Petitioner Lacked Required Experience in Power Sector. Court Held That Experience in Thermal Power Station Qualifies as Power Sector Experience and Selection Committee's Evaluation of Merit and Suitability Cannot Be Interfered With.

14 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Laxman Bhagwan Choudhari, a Deputy Chief Engineer at Bhusawal Thermal Power Station, challenged the selection of respondent No.5, Pank...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Wheeling Power to Own Units Is a Generating Company, Not Open Access Consumer, Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That Section 86(1)(f) Covers Disputes Between Licensees and Generating Companies, and the Appellant's Captive Power Plant Qualifies as a Generating Company.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and that the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under Sections 9, 10, and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Jan 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Tata Power Company Limited and others against the Government of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.

31 Aug 2020

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

4 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulator...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)