Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Licensee, Holds Captive Users Not Liable for Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4) of Electricity Act, 2003. Captive generation and open access for self-consumption are statutory rights under Section 9, not requiring State Commission permission, thus additional surcharge is not leviable.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (the distribution licensee) against the order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, which held that captive consumers are not liable to pay additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The distribution licensee had filed a petition before the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (State Commission) seeking approval to levy additional surcharge on all open access consumers, including those sourcing power from captive power plants. The State Commission initially held that additional surcharge is not applicable to captive users to the extent of self-consumption, but later, in a review petition, allowed the levy on captive consumers. The captive consumers appealed to the Appellate Tribunal, which set aside the State Commission's order, holding that captive users are not liable to pay additional surcharge. The Supreme Court was asked to decide whether captive consumers are liable to pay additional surcharge under Section 42(4). The Court examined Sections 9 and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003. It noted that Section 9 grants a statutory right to any person to construct, maintain, or operate a captive generating plant and dedicated transmission lines without requiring permission from the State Commission. Sub-section (2) of Section 9 gives the right to open access for carrying electricity from the captive plant to the destination of use, subject only to availability of adequate transmission facility. The Court held that this right is not subject to State Commission permission. Section 42(4) imposes additional surcharge only when the State Commission permits a consumer to receive supply from a person other than the distribution licensee. Since captive users exercise a statutory right under Section 9 and do not require such permission, they are not liable to pay additional surcharge for self-consumption. The Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Appellate Tribunal's order.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Captive Generation - Statutory Right - Section 9, Electricity Act, 2003 - Captive generation is a statutory right under Section 9, and a person may construct, maintain or operate a captive generating plant without permission from the State Commission. The right to open access for carrying electricity from the captive plant to the destination of use is also granted by the Act, subject only to availability of transmission facility. (Paras 9-10)

B) Electricity Law - Additional Surcharge - Levy on Captive Users - Section 42(4), Electricity Act, 2003 - Additional surcharge under Section 42(4) is leviable only when the State Commission permits a consumer or class of consumers to receive supply from a person other than the distribution licensee. Since captive users exercise a statutory right under Section 9 and do not require such permission, they are not liable to pay additional surcharge for self-consumption from captive plants. (Paras 11-12)

C) Electricity Law - Open Access - Captive Users - Section 9(2), Electricity Act, 2003 - The right to open access for captive users is not subject to State Commission permission; it is conditioned only by availability of transmission facility determined by the Central or State Transmission Utility. Disputes regarding transmission facility may be adjudicated by the Appropriate Commission. (Para 9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether captive consumers/captive users are liable to pay the additional surcharge leviable under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, holding that captive consumers/captive users are not liable to pay additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Court affirmed the order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity.

Law Points

  • Captive generation is a statutory right under Section 9 of the Electricity Act
  • 2003
  • not requiring State Commission permission
  • open access for captive use is also a statutory right
  • additional surcharge under Section 42(4) applies only when State Commission permits a consumer to receive supply from a person other than the distribution licensee
  • captive users are not liable to pay additional surcharge for self-consumption from captive plants.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (12) 56

Civil Appeal Nos. 5074-5075 of 2019

2021-12-10

M.R. Shah

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

M/s. JSW Steel Limited & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Appellate Tribunal for Electricity regarding levy of additional surcharge on captive consumers under Section 42(4) of Electricity Act, 2003.

Remedy Sought

Appellant distribution licensee sought to levy additional surcharge on captive consumers; captive consumers sought exemption from such levy.

Filing Reason

Dispute over whether captive consumers are liable to pay additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

Previous Decisions

State Commission initially held additional surcharge not applicable to captive users, but later allowed levy; Appellate Tribunal set aside State Commission's order, holding captive users not liable.

Issues

Whether captive consumers/captive users are liable to pay additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that captive generation under Section 9 is subject to regulations and open access is subject to availability of transmission facility, thus Section 42(4) applies and captive users are liable to pay additional surcharge. Respondents argued that captive generation is a statutory right not requiring State Commission permission, and additional surcharge under Section 42(4) applies only when State Commission permits a consumer to receive supply from a person other than the distribution licensee.

Ratio Decidendi

Captive generation under Section 9 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is a statutory right not requiring permission from the State Commission. The right to open access for carrying electricity from the captive plant to the destination of use is also granted by the Act, subject only to availability of transmission facility. Additional surcharge under Section 42(4) is leviable only when the State Commission permits a consumer to receive supply from a person other than the distribution licensee. Since captive users exercise a statutory right and do not require such permission, they are not liable to pay additional surcharge for self-consumption from captive plants.

Judgment Excerpts

The short question which is posed for the consideration of this Court is : 'Whether the captive consumers/captive users are liable to pay the additional surcharge leviable under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003?' On a fair reading of Section 9, it can be seen that captive generation is permitted under sub-section (1) of Section 9. As per sub-section (2), every person, who has constructed a captive generating plant and maintains and operates such plant, shall have the right to open access for the purposes of carrying electricity from his captive generating plant to the destination of his use... Sub-section (4) of Section 42 shall be applicable only in a case where the State Commission permits a consumer or class of consumers to receive supply of electricity from a person other than the distribution licensee of his area of supply and only such consumer shall be liable to pay additional surcharge on the charges of wheeling...

Procedural History

The distribution licensee filed a petition before the State Commission for MYT approval, which initially held additional surcharge not applicable to captive users. Later, in a review petition, the State Commission allowed levy of additional surcharge on captive consumers. The captive consumers appealed to the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, which set aside the State Commission's order. The distribution licensee then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Electricity Act, 2003: 9, 42
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Licensee, Holds Captive Users Not Liable for Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4) of Electricity Act, 2003. Captive generation and open access for self-consumption are statutory rights under Section ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Dismissal of Husband's Divorce Petition. Court Affirms Decree Based on Lack of Proof of Cruelty and Abandonment.