Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 72
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulatory Commission (respondent No.4) dated 3rd August 2004, which dismissed MSEB's application (Case No.57 of 2003). MSEB sought a declaration that respondent No.2 (Bhushan Steel & Strips Ltd.) was not entitled to sell power to respondent No.3 (Vipras Castings Limited) without a valid licence under Sections 12 to 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Respondent No.2 had set up a Captive Power generating Plant (CPP) and was supplying power to respondent No.3, which was a defaulter of MSEB. The Commission dismissed the application, holding that a captive generating plant is not required to obtain a licence to sell electricity to any person under Section 9 of the Act. The High Court admitted the petition on 15th March 2005 and heard it finally due to urgency. The court analyzed the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, particularly Section 9, which allows a captive generating plant to sell electricity to any person without a licence, and Sections 12 to 15, which apply to licensees. The court held that the Commission's order was correct and dismissed the petition, upholding the right of captive generating plants to sell electricity to third parties without a licence.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Captive Generating Plant - Licence Requirement - Sections 9, 12-15, 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003 - Whether a captive generating plant requires a licence to sell electricity to a third party - The court held that Section 9 of the Electricity Act, 2003 permits a captive generating plant to sell electricity to any person without a licence, and Sections 12 to 15 do not apply to such sales. The Regulatory Commission's order dismissing MSEB's application was upheld. (Paras 1-10)

B) Electricity Law - Regulatory Commission - Jurisdiction - Section 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 - The State Regulatory Commission has the jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes between licensees and generating companies regarding sale of electricity. The Commission's order was within its powers. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a captive generating plant requires a licence under Sections 12 to 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to sell electricity to a third party (another industrial consumer).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulatory Commission dated 3rd August 2004.

Law Points

  • Captive generating plant can sell electricity to any person without licence under Section 9 of the Electricity Act
  • 2003
  • Sections 12 to 15 not applicable to captive generators
  • Regulatory Commission's order upheld
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 218

Writ Petition No.882 of 2005

2005-04-04

H.L. Gokhale, S.C. Dharmadhikari

Mr. G.R. Joshi with Mrs. Deepa Chavan i/by M/s. Little & Co. for petitioner; Mr. L.T. Satelkar, AGP for respondent No.1; Mr. P.N. Mody with A.N. Jakhadi for respondent No.2; Mr. O.J. Menezes for respondent No.3; Mr. Rajiv Chavan with Mr. D.A. Dubey for respondent No.5

Maharashtra State Electricity Board

State of Maharashtra, through Director of Industries; M/s. Bhushan Steel & Strips Ltd.; Vipras Castings Limited; Maharashtra State Electricity Regulatory Commission; Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of State Regulatory Commission dismissing application seeking declaration that captive generating plant cannot sell power to third party without licence.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought declaration that respondent No.2 was not entitled to sell power to third party without licence and order to stop such sale.

Filing Reason

Petitioner filed application before Regulatory Commission which was dismissed; hence filed writ petition to challenge that order.

Previous Decisions

Regulatory Commission dismissed Case No.57 of 2003 on 3rd August 2004.

Issues

Whether a captive generating plant requires a licence under Sections 12 to 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to sell electricity to a third party.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that respondent No.2 required a licence under Sections 12 to 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to sell power to respondent No.3. Respondent No.2 and 3 argued that Section 9 of the Electricity Act, 2003 permits captive generating plants to sell electricity to any person without a licence.

Ratio Decidendi

A captive generating plant is not required to obtain a licence under Sections 12 to 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to sell electricity to any person, as Section 9 of the Act expressly permits such sale without a licence.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner herein is Maharashtra State Electricity Board (for short 'MSEB') constituted under the provisions of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948. This Application sought a declaration that respondent No.2 was not entitled to sell power to third party in the absence of a valid licence as required under Sections 12 to 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Case No.57 of 2003 before Maharashtra State Electricity Regulatory Commission, which was dismissed on 3rd August 2004. Petitioner then filed Writ Petition No.882 of 2005 in Bombay High Court, which was admitted on 15th March 2005 and heard finally.

Acts & Sections

  • Electricity Act, 2003: 2(7), 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 42, 86
  • Electricity Supply Act, 1948:
  • Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 198...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Rent Default Case, Restores Ejectment Decree. Tenant's Failure to Pay Rent for Over a Decade Constitutes Willful Default Under Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control...