Search Results for "APMC election eligibility"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Addresses Reference on APMC Election Eligibility of Gram Panchayat Members. Reference Pertains to Interpretation of Sections 13(1)(a)(ii) and 15 and Rule 36 for Former and Current Gram Panchayat Members.

The matter came before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, on a reference made by a learned Single Judge in a batch of writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging APMC Election Without Inclusion of Gram-Panchayat Members in Voters' List. Election process of APMC Tumsar set aside for non-compliance with Section 11(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Sadashiv Shivaji Dhenge, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Hardoli in 2017, which falls within the territorial jurisdiction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Grampanchayats to Participate in APMC Elections as Nominees of Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Grampanchayat Held to Be a Local Authority Entitled to Nominate Members to APMC Under Section 11 of the Act.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats (village councils) in Maharashtra challenging the rejection of their nomination form...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging APMC Nagpur Election Process and Government Orders Extending Board Tenure

The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions and a contempt petition concerning the elections and administration of the Agricultural Produce Marke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination Papers for Municipal Council Elections. Candidates Failed to Produce Required Documents Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 and Rules Thereunder.

The petitioners, ten individuals, filed nomination papers for election to the Municipal Council, Dharur, District Beed. The last date for filing nomin...