High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Addresses Reference on APMC Election Eligibility of Gram Panchayat Members. Reference Pertains to Interpretation of Sections 13(1)(a)(ii) and 15 and Rule 36 for Former and Current Gram Panchayat Members.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter came before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, on a reference made by a learned Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions concerning elections to Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMC) under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The writ petitions were filed by various individuals and gram panchayats from Latur district challenging aspects of APMC elections, including the eligibility of erstwhile and current gram panchayat members to contest and vote. The reference raised four substantial questions: (i) whether former gram panchayat members could contest APMC elections when not members on the polling date under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) and proviso to Section 15 of the Act; (ii) whether such former members could be deemed voters merely because they remained on the voters' list prepared under Rule 36 of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Rules, 1967; (iii) whether current gram panchayat members forming the village panchayat constituency for four seats could vote and whether procedural rules should be interpreted flexibly to achieve the statutory object; and (iv) whether the village panchayat constituency could be bypassed and deprived of representation for Chairman and Vice Chairman posts. The court noted the object of the Act is to develop and regulate the marketing of agricultural produce and to secure fair prices for agriculturists, with the market committee primarily consisting of fifteen agriculturists residing in the committee's area. The judgment was reserved on 17 March 2023 and pronounced on 4 May 2023. The provided excerpt does not include the court's final reasoning or directions on the referred questions.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Agricultural Produce Market Committee Elections - Candidate Eligibility - Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Section 13(1)(a)(ii) - The reference raised whether erstwhile members of gram panchayat could contest elections to APMC when they are not members on the date of polling; the issue turns on interpretation of the qualification provision and the question was referred for determination (Paras 2).

B) Election Law - Agricultural Produce Market Committee Elections - Voter Eligibility - Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Section 15 proviso read with Agriculture Produce Market Committee Rules, 1967, Rule 36 - The reference raised whether former gram panchayat members named in voters' list prepared under Rule 36 could vote despite extinguishment of membership on polling date; the issue concerns continuing effect of inclusion in the voters' list (Paras 2).

C) Election Law - Agricultural Produce Market Committee Elections - Village Panchayat Constituency Representation - Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Section 13(1)(a)(ii) - The reference raised whether persons constituting gram panchayat on the date of polling would be entitled to vote in their capacity as gram panchayat members forming village panchayat constituency for four members to be elected; the question was whether procedural rules should be flexed and interpreted harmoniously to fulfil statutory object (Paras 2).

D) Election Law - Agricultural Produce Market Committee Elections - Bypassing Village Panchayat Constituency - Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Sections 13, 15 - The reference raised whether the village panchayat constituency could be by-passed and kept away from having its representatives elected to the posts of Chairman and/or Vice Chairman in the given situation (Paras 2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether erstwhile/former members of gram panchayat can contest elections to APMC when not members on date of polling; whether they can be deemed voters if in voters' list under Rule 36; whether current gram panchayat members constituting village panchayat constituency can vote; and whether village panchayat constituency can be bypassed for election of Chairman/Vice Chairman.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Eligibility to contest APMC elections under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act
  • 1963
  • voter eligibility under Rule 36 of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Rules
  • 1967
  • proviso to Section 15 of the Act
  • interpretation of procedural rules in consonance with statutory object
  • representation of village panchayat constituency for four seats in APMC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (05) 12

Writ Petition No.8472 of 2015 with Civil Application No.6683 of 2016, along with Writ Petition Nos.6027 of 2015, 7952 of 2015, 7950 of 2015 and 10694 of 2015

2023-05-04

Mangesh S. Patil, Arun R. Pedneker

Amit A. Mukhedkar, S. B. Yawalkar, B. N. Patil, D. J. Choudhary, A. G. Ambetkar, A. N. Irpatgire, Shrikant Y. Patil, Ajinkya Reddy, Shrikishan S. Shinde

Rajkumar s/o Venkatrao Kalme & Ors., Vishal Vishwanath s/o Pratap Patil & Ors., Gram Panchayat Bolegaon (Bk.) & Ors., Gram Panchayat Aurad Shahajani & Ors., Pandharinath S/o Suryabhan Hulsure & Ors.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors., District Collector Latur, District Deputy Registrar/Returning Officer, Agricultural Produce Market Committee Latur & Ors., and private respondents

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging APMC elections and raising questions of law regarding eligibility of gram panchayat members to contest and vote

Remedy Sought

Reference made by Single Judge to Division Bench on four questions of law concerning APMC elections

Filing Reason

Dispute over whether erstwhile and current gram panchayat members can contest or vote in APMC elections under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) and Rule 36

Issues

Whether the erstwhile/former (past) members of gram panchayat be allowed to contest elections to membership of APMC when they are not members of gram panchayat on the date of polling, taking into account provisions of section 13 (1) (a) (ii) and proviso to section 15 of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963? Whether despite extinguishment of membership of gram panchayat on the date of polling for elections to APMC, erstwhile/former (past) members be deemed to be voters only for the reason, them being in voters' list prepared pursuant to Rule 36 of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee Rules, 1967 Rules, and should they be allowed to vote? Whether the persons constituting gram panchayat on the date of polling of elections to APMC would not be entitled to vote in said elections in their capacity as gram panchayat members forming village panchayat constituency for four members to be elected from that constituency to APMC in given/present situation and whether in such a case, procedural rules should not be required to be flexed and interpreted by harmonious, reconciliatory approach and adaptation of the same to the present/given situation, having regard to object, intention and purpose underlying main provisions of Agriculture Produce Market Committee (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963? Whether in the present/given situation village panchayat constituency can be by-passed and kept away from having its representatives elected to the posts of Chairman and/or Vice Chairman?

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the erstwhile/former (past) members of gram panchayat be allowed to contest elections to membership of APMC when they are not members of gram panchayat on the date of polling, taking into account provisions of section 13 (1) (a) (ii) and proviso to section 15 of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 ? The object of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 is to develop and regulate the marketing of agricultural and certain other produce in the market areas to be established in the State and to confer upon the market committees powers for the purposes of connecting with such markets and to establish market fund for the purpose of the market committees.

Procedural History

Writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad challenging aspects of APMC elections. A learned Single Judge referred four substantial questions of law to a Division Bench. The Division Bench heard the reference and reserved judgment on 17 March 2023, pronouncing it on 4 May 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963: Section 13(1)(a)(ii), Section 15, proviso to Section 15
  • Agricultural Produce Market Committee Rules, 1967: Rule 36
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Custodial Rape and Delay in FIR. The court held that allegations of rape on three occasions did not attract Section 376(2)(f) IPC as the vict...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Goshala's Petition for Custody of Cattles Seized in Cruelty Case — Interim Custody Granted to Owners on Supurtnama. Court holds that under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, the owners are entitled to interi...