Search Results for "sanction under Section 45(1)"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Leading Firemen/Tandel Against Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years. Reclassification of Post from Class-IV to Class-III Does Not Automatically Change Retirement Age Fixed Under Municipal Service Regulations, 1954.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Leading Firemen/Tandel (also referred to as Tandel) employed with the Pune Municipal Corporation, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows BEST and EVEY Appeals in Electric Bus Tender Dispute. Tender Condition Requiring 200 Km Range in Actual Conditions Upheld as Valid and Non-Arbitrary.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by BEST and EVEY Trans Pvt. Ltd. and set aside the Bombay High Court's order dated 05.07.2022. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Letters Patent Appeals Against Dismissal of Writ Petitions in Land Lease Resumption Case — Outcome Not Stated in Provided Excerpt

The dispute pertained to a plot of land in Bandra, Mumbai, originally leased by the Secretary of State for India in 1906 to Mrs. E.J. Menesse and othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows IGST Refund to Exporter Despite Initial Error in GST Return. Inadvertent Mistake in Invoice Number and Port Code in GSTR-1 Does Not Bar Refund of IGST on Zero-Rated Supply Under Section 16(3) of IGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Sunlight Cable Industries, exported insulated cables to M/s. Khin Maung Tum & Brothers Co. Ltd., Myanmar, and paid Integrated Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development Plan Reservation and TDR Compensation in Kolhapur. Court upholds reservation of land for playground and finds that TDR is valid compensation under MRTP Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by M/s. Bhima Mahabharat Builders and Developers, Zakir Nasirruddin Peerzade, and Anand rao Mahadeo M...