Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Letters Patent Appeals Against Dismissal of Writ Petitions in Land Lease Resumption Case — Outcome Not Stated in Provided Excerpt

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute pertained to a plot of land in Bandra, Mumbai, originally leased by the Secretary of State for India in 1906 to Mrs. E.J. Menesse and others. The lease was acquired by Dr. Vincent Pereira in 1934, and a renewed lease was executed in 1975 for 30 years from 1951 on the same terms. Before his death in 1981, Dr. Pereira entered into a development agreement in 1978 with M/s. Kalpak Builders for construction of a multi-storied building, leading to the formation of Vinaper Castle Co-operative Housing Society. On 23 August 1986, the Additional Collector issued a show cause notice alleging breach of the lease condition prohibiting transfer without prior permission, as the land had been transferred to a co-operative society and construction undertaken. Legal representatives of the deceased lessee responded denying breach and pointing out that notice was required to all heirs and the Court Receiver. The Collector, after hearing, passed an order on 26 April 1993 resuming the land and directing the society to give an undertaking to clear liabilities and accept transfer terms, failing which it would be treated as an encroacher. Multiple appeals were filed against this order before the Additional Commissioner, who, on 4 September 1997, set aside the resumption order on the ground that it was passed without notice to all legal representatives and remanded the matter for fresh enquiry. A fresh notice was issued by the Collector on 25 July 2006. In 2007, Malcolm Pereira, one of the legal representatives, died and bequeathed his share to the second appellant. Writ petitions were thereafter filed and were dismissed by a Single Judge of the High Court on 5 November 2012. The present Letters Patent Appeals were preferred against that dismissal. The Division Bench heard the parties and reserved judgment on 30 July 2013, delivering the same on 29 October 2013. The provided text does not contain the court’s analysis, findings, or final operative order.

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.9449 OF 2009

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (10) 49

Letters Patent Appeal No.272 of 2012 in Writ Petition No.9449 of 2009 along with Letters Patent Appeal No.60 of 2012 in Writ Petition No.3909 of 2012 and Civil Application Nos.451 of 2012 and 101 of 2013

2013-10-29

A.S. Oka, Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar

S.U. Kamdar, Naval Agarwal, Ferzana Behramkadin, Shivani Khanna, Sandeep Parikh, P. Chabuswar, Ravi Kadam, Abhinandan B. Vagyani, D.S. Patil, S.G. Aney, Sanjay Jain, Kalpesh Mehta, Vasim Shaikh, P.K. Dhakephlakar, G.S. Godbole, Dushyant Purekar, Ferzana Behramkamdin, Shivani Khanna

Wilfred Anthony Jose Pereira, Daphne May Teresa Pereira (LPA No.272 of 2012); Bernadette Fernandes (LPA No.60 of 2012)

The State of Maharashtra, Collector Mumbai Suburban District, Additional Commissioner Konkan Division, Dr. Celine Mary Philomena Aranjo, Melanie Fialho, Gemma Patricia Ann Brown, Percival Joseph Pereira, Bernadette Fernandes, Legal Representatives of Prakash Shankar Wagh, M/s. Vinaper Castle Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Nipun Ishwardas Thakkar, Vijaya Nipun Thakkar, Naman Nipun Thakkar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding resumption of government leasehold land for alleged breach of lease condition (transfer without permission) and construction of multi-storied building, leading to challenges by legal representatives of original lessee and the co-operative housing society.

Remedy Sought

Appellants in Letters Patent Appeals sought setting aside of the Single Judge's order dismissing their writ petitions; originally, legal representatives challenged the resumption order and sought declaration of no breach and rights over the land.

Filing Reason

Collector’s show cause notice and subsequent resumption order for alleged breach of lease condition led to multiple rounds of litigation including appeals, writ petitions, and eventually the Letters Patent Appeals.

Previous Decisions

Collector’s order dated 26 April 1993 resuming land was set aside by Additional Commissioner on 4 September 1997 due to lack of notice to all legal representatives and remanded for fresh enquiry. Writ petitions filed thereafter were dismissed by Single Judge on 5 November 2012, giving rise to these appeals.

Judgment Excerpts

The property in dispute is plot No.228 admeasuring 1858 sq.yards equivalent to 1551.80 sq.metres bearing Survey No.228, City Survey Nos.B/736, B/737, B/738, B/739 and B/743 (for short, ‘the said land’) situated at Bandra, Taluka Andheri in Mumbai Suburban District. On 26th April, 1993, an order was passed by the Collector by which the said land was ordered to be resumed. It was directed that the said Society shall give an undertaking to clear the liabilities of the legal representatives of the original lessee and to accept terms and conditions of transfer of lease. It was directed that if such undertaking was not furnished within the stipulated time, the society will be treated as an encroacher on the said land.

Procedural History

Original lease executed on 17 December 1906; acquired by Dr. Vincent Pereira in 1934; renewed lease executed on 15 January 1975 for 30 years from 1 January 1951; Dr. Pereira entered development agreement in 1978 for construction of Vinaper Castle; society formed; after his death in 1981, show cause notice issued on 23 August 1986 for breach of lease condition; Collector ordered resumption on 26 April 1993; appeals filed; Additional Commissioner set aside order on 4 September 1997 and remanded; fresh enquiry initiated on 25 July 2006; Malcolm Pereira (LR) died on 2 May 2007; writ petitions filed and dismissed by Single Judge on 5 November 2012; Letters Patent Appeals filed and heard; judgment reserved on 30 July 2013 and delivered on 29 October 2013.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Letters Patent Appeals Against Dismissal of Writ Petitions in Land Lease Resumption Case — Outcome Not Stated in Provided Excerpt