Search Results for "court fee stamp"

252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Corruption Case for Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Appellant convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs. 500 as illegal gratification for processing a grant application.

The appellant, Manoj Shankar Deshpande, a public servant working as an Assistant in the Fisheries Department, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Dispute Over Partition Decree: Role of Court and Collector in Agricultural Land Partition. Analyzing procedural irregularities and lack of natural justice in the partition process led by the Tahsildar, with proposed improvements for a fair resolution.

Legal dispute concerning the execution of a partition decree involving a sister's claim to her parents' property. It delves into the procedural aspect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Challenge to Valuation Order in Family Court. Court Holds That Valuation of Relief of Possession Must Be as on Date of Filing Petition Under Section 6(v) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

The petitioner wife challenged an order of the Family Court No.6, Bandra, Mumbai dated 25 July 2012, which directed the respondent husband to value th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...