Search Results for "Central Government clearance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Central Government clearance"

370 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 370 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Mining Lease Renewal — Lease Deemed Expired Under Section 8A of MMDR Act, 1957. The petitioner's mining lease for iron ore in Goa expired on 22.11.2007, and the renewal application was rejected; no automatic extension under Section 8A as the lease had already expired.

8 May 2026

The petitioners, Shantilal Khushaldas & Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Mukesh M. Saglani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 05.11....

High Court

Madras High Court Allows State Appeal in Contractual GST Dispute — Writ Court Cannot Adjudicate Contractual Obligations Under Article 226. Contractor Bound by Agreed Terms Including G.O.Ms.264 and Subsequent Amendments, Cannot Challenge Application of G.O.Ms.296 in Writ Proceedings.

4 Mar 2026

The State of Tamil Nadu and the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board filed an intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against a single jud...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of Residential Complex in Eco-Sensitive Zone — No Violation of Environmental Norms Found. Court held that construction was permitted under the Regional Plan and that the project had obtained all necessary approvals from the Town and Country Planning Department, Goa State Pollution Control Board, and other authorities.

30 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by four petitioners against the construction of a residential complex in Sirsaim, Goa. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Part Occupation Certificate for Building Height Violation. Flat Purchasers Cannot Seek Revocation of Occupation Certificate as They Have Alternative Remedy Under RERA and No Vested Right to Challenge Planning Permissions.

16 Oct 2018

The petitioners, Sanjay Phulwaria and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maintainability of Civil Revision Against Director's Order Under Section 66(7) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act. Order of Director of Panchayats under Section 66(7) is final and binding, and no Civil Revision lies under Section 201-B of the Act.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Competent Automobiles Company Ltd., applied for a licence to construct a Beach Resort at village Arossim, Goa, based on a technical cl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

5 Mar 2015

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Central Excise Interest Liability Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Interest on differential duty under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable when price variation clause exists and duty is paid after price revision.

14 Jun 2013

The case involves an appeal by Gammon India Ltd. (formerly Associated Transrail Structures Ltd.) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case: Commissioner's Decision on Nil Duty Binding on Assessing Officer. Duty on DTA Clearances of Fresh Mushrooms by 100% EOU Held Nil Following Commissioner's Order Under Section 3(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

14 Dec 2012

The appellant, ECO Valley Farms & Foods Limited, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in cultivation, manufacture, and export of fresh/processed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Appointment as CESTAT Member — Selection Committee Recommendation Not Binding on Appointing Authority. The court held that the petitioner had no right to appointment based solely on the recommendation of the Selection Committee, and the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (A.C.C.) was entitled to withhold approval.

22 Aug 2006

The petitioner, Ramesh Motiram Ramchandani, a Commissioner (Appeals-I) in Customs & Central Excise, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)