Search Results for "regional commissioner"

1716 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1716 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Declare Resignation Effective from Date of Tender in Standing Committee Membership Dispute. Resignation from Standing Committee takes effect from date of tender when accepted unconditionally, not from date of acceptance.

The petitioner, Deepak Umakant Mathpati, Chairman of the Standing Committee of Latur Municipal Corporation (LMC), filed a writ petition seeking a decl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transport Appellate Tribunal Order — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Replacement Conditions Within Stipulated Time. Permit Renewal Denied as Petitioner Did Not Replace Vehicle Within Extended Time Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

The petitioner, Abdul Kadir, held a permit (No. T.Opp.3027/Aug/84) valid up to 26th September 1987 for vehicle MTS 2411. He applied for replacement of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Nominal Compensation of Rs.1/- Set Aside. Court held that when market value is determined, compensation cannot be reduced to a nominal amount under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Sadashiv Madhav Shelke, owned land Survey No.3/27 bearing City Survey No.908 admeasuring 258.18 sq. meters at Shirdi, Maharashtra. The ...