High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice — Land Owners Entitled to Hearing Before Demolition Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Principles of natural justice require notice and opportunity of hearing before demolition of alleged unauthorized construction under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Section 260 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Subhash Ramrao Jadhav, Khanderao Ramrao Jadhav, and Omprakash Ramrao Jadhav, are owners of lands bearing CTS Nos. 10908, 10909, 10910, 10912 and 10 situated in Nanded. They filed a writ petition challenging the action of the Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation (Respondent No. 3) in issuing a notice for demolition of alleged unauthorized construction on their land without affording them an opportunity of hearing. The petitioners contended that the Corporation acted arbitrarily and in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the District Collector, Nanded, opposed the petition. The court, after hearing the parties and the amicus curiae, held that the principles of natural justice must be followed before any coercive action of demolition is taken. The court directed the Municipal Corporation to give a notice to the petitioners and hear them before proceeding with the demolition. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Demolition of Unauthorized Construction - Right to Hearing - Section 53 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Section 260 Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - The petitioners, owners of land, challenged the demolition notice issued by the Municipal Corporation without giving them an opportunity of hearing. The court held that principles of natural justice require that before any coercive action of demolition, the affected party must be given a notice and an opportunity to show cause. The court directed the Corporation to hear the petitioners before taking any further action. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, as owners of the land, are entitled to a notice and hearing before the Municipal Corporation demolishes the alleged unauthorized construction under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. The Municipal Corporation is directed to give notice to the petitioners and hear them before taking any further action for demolition. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to hearing
  • Demolition of unauthorized construction
  • Section 53 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966
  • Section 260 Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act
  • 1949
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (02) 15

Writ Petition No. 7951 of 2011

2012-02-23

B. R. Gavai, Sunil P. Deshmukh

S.V. Natu for petitioners, K.M. Suryawanshi AGP for respondents 1 & 2, M.V. Deshpande for respondent 3, V.J. Dixit as amicus curiae

Subhash s/o Ramrao Jadhav, Khanderao s/o Ramrao Jadhav, Omprakash s/o Ramrao Jadhav

State of Maharashtra, District Collector Nanded, Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging demolition notice issued by Municipal Corporation without hearing

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of demolition notice and direction to hear them before demolition

Filing Reason

Municipal Corporation issued notice for demolition of alleged unauthorized construction without giving opportunity of hearing

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a notice and hearing before demolition of alleged unauthorized construction

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that demolition notice was issued without any opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice Respondents contended that the construction was unauthorized and liable to be demolished

Ratio Decidendi

Principles of natural justice require that before any coercive action of demolition, the affected party must be given a notice and an opportunity to show cause. The provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 do not exclude the application of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, with the consent of the parties. The petitioners, who are the owners of the lands bearing CTS Nos. 10908, 10909, 10910, 10912 and 10...

Procedural History

Writ Petition No. 7951 of 2011 filed in High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad. Rule issued and heard finally with consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 53
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949: 260
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing ab...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice — Land Owners Entitled to Hearing Before Demolition Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Principles of natural justice require notice and opportunity of hear...