High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Nominal Compensation of Rs.1/- Set Aside. Court held that when market value is determined, compensation cannot be reduced to a nominal amount under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 86
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sadashiv Madhav Shelke, owned land Survey No.3/27 bearing City Survey No.908 admeasuring 258.18 sq. meters at Shirdi, Maharashtra. The respondents acquired the land for the Pimpalwadi to Nimgaon shiv road, part of the Development Plan of Shirdi Municipal Council. Notification under Section 126(4) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 was published on 14.01.2008, and the Award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was passed on 04.11.2010. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) fixed the market value at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter but offered only nominal compensation of Rs.1/-. Dissatisfied, the claimant filed a Reference under Section 18 of the Act before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon (Reference Court), which dismissed the reference on 10.03.2016. The appellant then filed the present appeal. The High Court considered whether the Reference Court was justified in awarding nominal compensation despite determining market value. The court noted that the SLAO had determined market value but awarded only Rs.1/-, which was arbitrary. The High Court held that once market value is determined, the claimant is entitled to that value plus solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 24 of the Act. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment, and directed the respondents to pay compensation at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter with all statutory benefits, including solatium and interest, from the date of possession.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation - Market Value - Nominal Compensation - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 11, 18, 23, 24 - The appellant's land was acquired for road development under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The SLAO fixed market value at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter but offered only Rs.1/- as compensation. The Reference Court upheld this nominal award. The High Court held that once market value is determined, compensation cannot be reduced to a nominal amount; the claimant is entitled to the market value plus statutory benefits. (Paras 1-10)

B) Land Acquisition - Reference under Section 18 - Enhancement - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 18 - The claimant sought enhancement of compensation dissatisfied with the SLAO's award. The Reference Court dismissed the reference, but the High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the nominal compensation and directing payment of market value with solatium and interest. (Paras 2-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Reference Court was justified in awarding nominal compensation of Rs.1/- to the claimant despite determining the market value of the acquired land at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned judgment and award dated 10.03.2016 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon in LAR No.26 of 2012 is set aside. The respondents are directed to pay compensation to the appellant at the rate of Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter for the acquired land, along with all statutory benefits including solatium and interest as per Sections 23 and 24 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, from the date of possession.

Law Points

  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • Section 18
  • Section 11
  • Section 23
  • Section 24
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966
  • Section 126(4)
  • Compensation
  • Market Value
  • Nominal Compensation
  • Enhancement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 157

First Appeal No.2410 of 2016

2019-02-05

P.R. Bora, J.

Shri A.K. Gawali for Appellant; Shri S.J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent – State; Shri A.V. Hon for Respondent No.2

Sadashiv Madhav Shelke

The State of Maharashtra, Through Sub Divisional Officer, Shrirampur Division, Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar; Chief Officer, Shirdi Municipal Council, Shirdi, Tq Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal against judgment and award in Land Acquisition Reference (LAR) seeking enhancement of compensation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought enhancement of compensation from nominal Rs.1/- to market value of Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter with statutory benefits.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfied with the Reference Court's decision upholding nominal compensation of Rs.1/- despite determination of market value at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter.

Previous Decisions

SLAO Award dated 04.11.2010 fixed market value at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter but offered Rs.1/- compensation; Reference Court (Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon) dismissed reference on 10.03.2016.

Issues

Whether the Reference Court erred in awarding nominal compensation of Rs.1/- when the market value was determined at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter? Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation at the market value determined by the SLAO along with solatium and interest?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the SLAO having determined market value at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter, the Reference Court ought to have awarded compensation at that rate with statutory benefits, not nominal Rs.1/-. Respondents argued that the acquisition was for a road in the development plan and the claimant was not entitled to market value as the land was reserved for public purpose.

Ratio Decidendi

Once the market value of acquired land is determined by the SLAO, the claimant is entitled to compensation at that rate, and the Reference Court cannot reduce it to a nominal amount. The compensation must include solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has challenged the Judgment and Award passed in LAR No.26 of 2012 decided by the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division at Kopargaon on 10.03.2016. In the Award so passed, though the market value of the land acquired of the claimant was fixed at Rs.6,417/ per sq. meter, the SLAO offered nominal compensation of Rs.1/ to the claimant. Dissatisfied with the amount of compensation so offered, the claimant made Reference under Section 18 of the Act seeking enhancement in the amount of compensation.

Procedural History

SLAO passed Award on 04.11.2010 fixing market value at Rs.6,417/- per sq. meter but offering Rs.1/- compensation. Claimant filed Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon (Reference Court), which dismissed the reference on 10.03.2016. Appellant then filed First Appeal No.2410 of 2016 before the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad, which allowed the appeal on 05.02.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 11, 18, 23, 24
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 126(4)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order in Writ Petitions Challenging Premature Transfers of Commercial Tax Officers Under Transfer Guidelines 2013. Transfer Orders Allegedly Violated Minimum Tenure Rule and Requirement of Prior Approval of Chief Minis...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suo Motu Revision Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Initiated After 48 Years — Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Notice Vitiate Proceedings. The court held that the power of suo motu revisio...