Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Declare Resignation Effective from Date of Tender in Standing Committee Membership Dispute. Resignation from Standing Committee takes effect from date of tender when accepted unconditionally, not from date of acceptance.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Deepak Umakant Mathpati, Chairman of the Standing Committee of Latur Municipal Corporation (LMC), filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that respondent No. 4, Chandrakant Gurunath Birajdar, ceased to be a member of the Standing Committee from the date of his resignation, i.e., 28.05.2019, or alternatively from 20.06.2019, the date of acceptance. The facts reveal that respondent No. 4 tendered his resignation as a member of the Standing Committee on 28.05.2019, which was accepted by the erstwhile Mayor on 20.06.2019. Subsequently, respondent No. 4 did not attend any Standing Committee meetings from July 2019 to December 2019. On 11.12.2019, respondent No. 4 wrote a letter to the Municipal Secretary stating that he had resigned on 28.05.2019. However, on 21.12.2019, respondent No. 4 attended a Standing Committee meeting and claimed that his resignation was not effective. The petitioner argued that the resignation took effect from the date of tender, while respondent No. 4 contended that it took effect only from the date of acceptance. The court analyzed Section 5A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, and Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Standing Committee) Rules, 1994, which govern resignation from the Standing Committee. The court held that when a resignation is tendered unconditionally and accepted without any condition, it takes effect from the date of tender. The court reasoned that the resignation is a voluntary act, and once accepted, it relates back to the date of resignation. The court also noted that respondent No. 4's subsequent conduct of not attending meetings and writing a letter confirming his resignation indicated his intention to resign. Therefore, the court allowed the petition and declared that respondent No. 4 ceased to be a member of the Standing Committee from 28.05.2019.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Standing Committee - Resignation - Effective Date - Section 5A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Standing Committee) Rules, 1994 - The issue was whether resignation of a member of the Standing Committee takes effect from the date of tender or date of acceptance. The court held that when resignation is tendered unconditionally and accepted without any condition, it takes effect from the date of tender. The court relied on the principle that resignation is a voluntary act and once accepted, it relates back to the date of resignation. The court directed that respondent No. 4 ceased to be a member of the Standing Committee from 28.05.2019. (Paras 2-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the resignation of respondent No. 4 from the Standing Committee takes effect from the date of tender (28.05.2019) or from the date of acceptance (20.06.2019), and whether the respondent No. 4 ceased to be a member of the Standing Committee from the date of resignation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and declared that respondent No. 4 ceased to be a member of the Standing Committee of Latur Municipal Corporation with effect from 28.05.2019.

Law Points

  • Resignation takes effect from date of tender when accepted unconditionally
  • Resignation from Standing Committee under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1949
  • Section 5A of the Act
  • Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Standing Committee) Rules
  • 1994
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (10) 12

Writ Petition No. 2769 of 2020

2020-10-23

S. V. Gangapurwala, Shrikant D. Kulkarni

Shri Amit A. Yadkikar, Shri V. D. Hon, Shri A. V. Hon, Shri S. S. Manale, Shri A. N. Irpatgire

Deepak Umakant Mathpati

Latur Municipal Corporation, The Mayor, Municipal Secretary, Chandrakant Gurunath Birajdar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration that respondent No. 4 ceased to be a member of the Standing Committee from the date of his resignation.

Remedy Sought

Direction that respondent No. 4 ceases to be a member of the Standing Committee of Latur Municipal Corporation with effect from 28.05.2019 or 20.06.2019.

Filing Reason

Respondent No. 4 tendered resignation on 28.05.2019, accepted on 20.06.2019, but later attended a meeting on 21.12.2019 claiming resignation was not effective.

Issues

Whether the resignation of respondent No. 4 from the Standing Committee takes effect from the date of tender (28.05.2019) or from the date of acceptance (20.06.2019)? Whether respondent No. 4 ceased to be a member of the Standing Committee from the date of resignation?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that resignation takes effect from date of tender as per Section 5A of the Act and Rule 3 of the Rules. Respondent No. 4 argued that resignation takes effect only from date of acceptance.

Ratio Decidendi

When a resignation is tendered unconditionally and accepted without any condition, it takes effect from the date of tender. The resignation relates back to the date of resignation upon acceptance.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner seeks a direction that, the respondent No. 4 ceases to be a member of the Standing Committee of the Latur Municipal Corporation with effect from the date of his resignation i. e. 28.05.2019 and/or 20.06.2019 (the date of acceptance of resignation). The respondent No. 4 on or about 28.05.2019 tendered his resignation from the post of member of the Standing Committee. On 20th June, 2019, the resignation of the respondent No. 4 was accepted by the erstwhile Mayor.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 2769 of 2020 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. The court heard the matter and pronounced judgment on 23.10.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949: Section 5A
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Standing Committee) Rules, 1994: Rule 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 324 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Alleged Assault with Knife Fails as Medical Evidence Does Not Corroborate Ocular Testimony and Recovery of Weapon is Unreliable.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Victim's Appeal in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Cursory High Court Order. High Court Failed to Re-appreciate Evidence in Appeal Against Acquittal Under Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) of SC/ST Act and Sections 354, 504, 506 IPC.