PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003
21 Nov 2006The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...
Search Results for "acquisition notice"
3159 result(s) found
Found 3159 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference Appeal on Limitation Issue — Remands for Fresh Consideration. Notice under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 not served on appellants; knowledge from third party not official information under Section 18(2).
14 Oct 2011The appellants, Raju and Dnyaneshwar Rawale, were landowners whose land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a minor irrigation project. The L...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Land Acquisition Case — Railway Authority Directed to Pay Compensation for Land Acquired Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court held that the applicants were entitled to compensation for the land acquired by the Central Railway for construction of a railway line, and the acquisition proceedings were valid.
29 Jul 2013The case involves a civil revision application filed by five applicants (Santosh, Gorakh, Machindra, Popat, and Raghunath, all sons of Shivram or Baba...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Garden and Playground in Development Plan. Land Reserved Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Delay or Change of Purpose Once Acquisition Proceedings Are Initiated.
16 Feb 2015The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Abhijit Chandrakant Chaunda and Chandrashekhar Mallikarjunappa Bidve challenging the acquisition of ...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation for Ring Road Under MRTP Act — Purchase Notice Not Acted Upon Within Stipulated Period. Reservation of land for 24.0 m wide Ring Road under Development Plan of Sawantwadi City lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated within 12 months of purchase notice under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
25 Apr 2017The petitioners, Rabiya Raju Bagwan and Hawabi Shabuddin Sayyed, owned land bearing Survey No.55, Hissa No.9 and Survey No.24A, Hissa No.1/7 (CTS No.4...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions for Higher Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Evidence. Petitioners failed to seek reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 within time and did not produce evidence of higher market value.
30 Nov -0001The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners from Poyanje, Panvel Taluka, Raigad District, challenging the compensation awarded for t...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Revisional Authority Cannot Reopen Final Acquisition of Land as Private Forest Under Section 18 of M.P.F. Act.
29 Mar 2006The Petitioner, Feroz Shabbar Hussain, claiming to be the legal representative of the deceased original holder, filed a writ petition challenging an o...
- 146
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Section 6 Declaration Issued Beyond One Year from Last Publication of Section 4 Notification Invalidates Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
12 Dec 2013The petitioners, Riva Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its director Vishwanath Balaram Naik Palyekar, challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 ...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Challenge to Sections 17(2) and 32(1) Proviso of MMRDA Act by Consent. Land Acquisition by MMRDA Under Challenge: Petitioners Allege Unconstitutional Provisions in MMRDA Act, 1974.
15 Nov 2019The Bombay High Court heard and disposed of a group of matters comprising Writ Petition No. 841 of 2012, Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011, and...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Landowner's Appeal Against High Court's Grant of Additional Acquisition Time in Town Planning Case. Statutory timelines under Sections 126 and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are mandatory and courts cannot extend them beyond prescribed periods, setting aside direction for one-year additional acquisition time after reservation lapsed.
23 Mar 2022The dispute concerned land reserved for a playground in Latur's Development Plan under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The appel...
- 222
