Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Revisional Authority Cannot Reopen Final Acquisition of Land as Private Forest Under Section 18 of M.P.F. Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 53
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Feroz Shabbar Hussain, claiming to be the legal representative of the deceased original holder, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 4th October 2005 passed by the Minister for Revenue and Forests acting as the Revisional Authority under Section 18 of the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 (M.P.F. Act). The Petitioner also sought a prohibitory injunction restraining the Respondents from dispossessing him from agricultural land bearing Gat No. 46/1, admeasuring 2 Hectares 96 Ares, situated at Village Barwai, Tal. Panvel, Dist. Raigad. The land in question was originally held by Narayan Govind Shete and bore survey No. 27, Hissa No.4. On 24th January 1961, a notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forests Act, 1927 was issued to the landlord to show cause why the land should not be declared a private forest. The Petitioner claimed that his predecessor-in-title, Smt. Rubbabai Shabbar Hussein, had acquired the land from the original holder. An application was submitted for grant of licence to extract stone/rubble/murum from a natural quarry. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Panvel, by order dated 30th April 1999, held that the land was not a private forest and directed deletion of the entry in the record of rights. The State of Maharashtra filed a revision before the Minister under Section 18 of the M.P.F. Act. The Minister, by the impugned order dated 4th October 2005, set aside the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer and held that the land was a private forest. The Petitioner challenged this order. The High Court held that the land had already been acquired under the Indian Forests Act, 1927 and the M.P.F. Act, and the acquisition had become final. The Revisional Authority under Section 18 could not reopen the issue of acquisition. The Minister's order was quashed as it exceeded the revisional jurisdiction. The petition was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.

Headnote

A) Forest Law - Private Forest Acquisition - Finality of Acquisition - Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975, Section 18 - The Revisional Authority under Section 18 cannot reopen the issue of acquisition of land as a private forest after the acquisition has become final under the Act. The Petitioner's land was already acquired under the Indian Forests Act, 1927 and the M.P.F. Act, and the revisional order setting aside the acquisition was held to be without jurisdiction. (Paras 1-10)

B) Forest Law - Revisional Powers - Scope of Revision - Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975, Section 18 - The Revisional Authority's power under Section 18 is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-adjudicate matters that have attained finality. The Minister's order was quashed as it exceeded the revisional jurisdiction. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Revisional Authority under Section 18 of the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 can reopen the issue of acquisition of land as a private forest after the acquisition has become final under the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order dated 4th October 2005 passed by the Minister for Revenue and Forests, and held that the land was not a private forest and the acquisition had become final.

Law Points

  • Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act
  • 1975
  • Section 18
  • Indian Forests Act
  • 1927
  • Section 35(3)
  • Revisional Authority
  • Finality of Acquisition
  • Scope of Revision
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006:BHC-AS:6678-DB

WRIT PETITION NO. 3356 OF 2001

2006-03-29

V.G. Palshikar, V.R. Kingaonkar

2006:BHC-AS:6678-DB

Mr. G. V. Limaye for the Petitioner, Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for the Respondents

Feroz Shabbar Hussain

The State of Maharashtra, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Panvel, The Deputy Conservator of Forests, Alibag

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging revisional order under Section 18 of Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 4th October 2005 passed by the Minister for Revenue and Forests and prohibitory injunction restraining dispossession from land.

Filing Reason

The Minister set aside the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer which had held that the land was not a private forest.

Previous Decisions

Sub-Divisional Officer, Panvel, by order dated 30th April 1999, held that the land was not a private forest and directed deletion of entry in record of rights.

Issues

Whether the Revisional Authority under Section 18 of the M.P.F. Act can reopen the issue of acquisition of land as a private forest after the acquisition has become final.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the land was not a private forest and the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction. Respondents argued that the land was a private forest and the revisional order was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The Revisional Authority under Section 18 of the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 cannot reopen the issue of acquisition of land as a private forest after the acquisition has become final under the Act. The power of revision is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-adjudicate matters that have attained finality.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the Petitioner impugns the order dated 4th October, 2005 passed by the Minister for Revenue and Forests as a Revisional Authority under Section 18 of the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. The Revisional Authority under Section 18 cannot reopen the issue of acquisition of land as a private forest after the acquisition has become final under the Act.

Procedural History

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Panvel, by order dated 30th April 1999, held that the land was not a private forest. The State of Maharashtra filed a revision before the Minister under Section 18 of the M.P.F. Act. The Minister, by order dated 4th October 2005, set aside the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer and held that the land was a private forest. The Petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the revisional order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975: 18
  • Indian Forests Act, 1927: 35(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Revisional Authority Cannot Reopen Final Acquisition of Land as Private Forest Under Section 18 of M.P.F. Act.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging NGT Order on Environmental Clearance for Hotel Construction in CRZ Area — Petitioner Failed to Establish Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the NGT's finding that the construc...