Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation for Ring Road Under MRTP Act — Purchase Notice Not Acted Upon Within Stipulated Period. Reservation of land for 24.0 m wide Ring Road under Development Plan of Sawantwadi City lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated within 12 months of purchase notice under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 23
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Rabiya Raju Bagwan and Hawabi Shabuddin Sayyed, owned land bearing Survey No.55, Hissa No.9 and Survey No.24A, Hissa No.1/7 (CTS No.4480 and 4479) in Sawantwadi, Sindhudurg. On 1st April 1989, the Development Plan of Sawantwadi City was sanctioned, reserving their land for construction of a 24.0 meter wide Ring Road. On 10th August 2012, the petitioners issued a purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) to the Chief Officer of Respondent No.1-Sawantwadi Municipal Council and to Respondent No.2-Collector. The notice required the authorities to acquire the land or take steps for its acquisition within the statutory period. Despite receipt of the notice, no steps were taken by the Municipal Council or any other authority within the stipulated 12-month period. The petitioners then filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the reservation had lapsed and that the land be made available to them for development. The respondents, including the Municipal Council, Collector, District Town Planning Office, and State of Maharashtra, opposed the petition. An affidavit-in-reply was filed on behalf of Respondents 3 and 4 by Mr. Sanjay R. Kurvey, Joint Director of Town Planning, stating that the land formed an integral part of the Development Plan road network and that the reservation should be maintained. The court considered the provisions of Section 127 of the MRTP Act, which allows a landowner to serve a purchase notice on the planning authority if the land is not acquired within ten years from the date of the Development Plan. Upon receipt of such notice, the authority must take steps for acquisition within twelve months; failing which, the reservation lapses and the land becomes available to the owner for development. The court found that the purchase notice was validly served and that no acquisition proceedings or agreements were initiated within the prescribed period. The court rejected the respondents' argument that the road was essential for the city's development, holding that the statutory scheme under Section 127 is clear and mandatory. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation stood lapsed and directing that the land be made available to the petitioners for development in accordance with law. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Lapsing of Reservation - Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Purchase Notice - The petitioners' land was reserved for a 24.0 m wide Ring Road in the Development Plan sanctioned on 1st April 1989. They issued a purchase notice on 10th August 2012 under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. Since no steps for acquisition were taken within 12 months, the reservation lapsed. The court held that the land becomes available to the owner for development as if no reservation existed. (Paras 1-6)

B) Town Planning - Purchase Notice - Compliance - Section 127 of MRTP Act - The purchase notice was addressed to the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council and the Collector. The court found that the notice was valid and the authorities failed to act. The lapsing provision is automatic upon expiry of 12 months without acquisition or agreement. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation of the petitioners' land for a Ring Road under the Development Plan of Sawantwadi City stood lapsed due to failure of the Municipal Council to take steps for acquisition within the stipulated period after receipt of purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation of the petitioners' land for the Ring Road under the Development Plan of Sawantwadi City stood lapsed. The court directed that the land be made available to the petitioners for development in accordance with law. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Reservation lapses if no acquisition steps taken within 12 months of purchase notice under Section 127 MRTP Act
  • Landowner entitled to development permission after lapsing
  • Purchase notice must be addressed to appropriate authority
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (04) 159

Writ Petition No.10259 of 2013

2017-04-25

Naresh H. Patil, Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi

2017:BHC-AS:12214-DB

Mr. G.H. Keluskar for the Petitioners, Mr. S.M. Railkar for Respondent No.1, Mr. Vikas Mali, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos.2 to 4-State

Rabiya Raju Bagwan and Hawabi Shabuddin Sayyed

Sawantwadi Municipal Council and Town Planning Authority, Collector of Sindhudurg, District Town Planning Office, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration that reservation of land for Ring Road under Development Plan lapsed due to non-compliance with purchase notice under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a direction to declare that the reservation of their land for construction of Ring Road stood lapsed and that the land be made available to them for development.

Filing Reason

The petitioners issued a purchase notice on 10th August 2012 under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, but no steps for acquisition were taken within the stipulated 12-month period.

Issues

Whether the reservation of the petitioners' land for a Ring Road under the Development Plan lapsed due to failure of the Municipal Council to take steps for acquisition within 12 months of the purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they issued a valid purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act on 10th August 2012, and since no acquisition steps were taken within 12 months, the reservation lapsed and the land should be made available to them. Respondents argued that the land was part of a vital road network for the city's development and that the reservation should be maintained.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, if a landowner serves a purchase notice on the planning authority and the authority fails to take steps for acquisition within twelve months, the reservation lapses automatically and the land becomes available to the owner for development as if no reservation existed.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioners pray for a direction to declare that reservation in respect of their land... stood lapsed and the said land be made available to the Petitioners for the purpose of development. Since after receipt of the said notice, no steps were taken according to law by the Respondent No.1-Municipal Council within the stipulated time-frame.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court after their purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act was not acted upon. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 25th April 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Revokes Heirship Certificate Granted Under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 Due to Suppression of Material Facts and Non-Joinder of Other Legal Heirs. The court held that an heirship certificate obtained by suppressing the existence o...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Defendants' Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholding Grant of Relief. Concurrent Findings on Validity of Agreement to Sell and Payment of Consideration Are Not Interfered With Under Article 136 of the Constitution of Ind...