Search Results for "promotion orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "promotion orders"

1927 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1927 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employee in Disability Act Promotion Dispute Despite Compassionate Appointment. Reservation in Promotion Under Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 Applies Irrespective of Initial Appointment Mode, Including Compassionate Grounds, as per Sections 32 and 33 and Judicial Precedent.

28 Jun 2021

The dispute centered on the promotion rights of a person with disability under the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Right...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Promotion to Sanitary Supervisor Post in Defence Establishment. Petitioner entitled to promotion from date of vacancy with consequential benefits as post existed and was not abolished.

10 Feb 2005

The petitioner, M. Venugopalan, was employed as a Sanitary Inspector under the Ministry of Defence and was promoted to that post on 25.5.1978. He clai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Antedated Promotion and Seniority Revision for Municipal Employee. Petitioner's claim for deemed promotion date from 2008 rejected due to pending disciplinary proceedings and subsequent penalty.

2 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Himmat Dalichand Mali, an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) belonging to the Vimukta Jati category, filed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Superintendent and Section Officer Employees Challenging Deemed Date of Promotion. Deemed Date of Promotion Must Be from Date of Promotion Order, Not from Date of Caste Validity Certificate, When Employees Not Responsible for Delay.

1 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Ashok Wankar, Pramod Gargilwar, Chhatrapati Sonule, and Kishor Lakde, were employees of Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur, holding posts of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deemed Promotion to Retired Employee Despite Disciplinary Proceedings — Employer Cannot Ignore Exoneration by Enquiry Officer. Stigmatic remarks in disagreement order set aside as promotion cannot be denied when employee is exonerated of all charges.

30 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Rajendra S/o Baburao Patil, a retired employee of Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, filed a writ petition seeking deemed date of promotion to t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Artisan Staff Challenging Grade-Wise Seniority in Indian Navy. Promotion Policy Based on Combined Seniority Roster Upheld as Valid and Non-Discriminatory.

10 May 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Artisan Staff of the Indian Navy challenging the common judgment of the Central Administrativ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

5 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition by BBMP Employees Challenging Promotion of Juniors Based on PUC Qualification. Senior Group D Employees Claim Discrimination as 2014 Clarification Exempted SSLC Holders from PUC Requirement for Promotion to Tax Inspector Posts.

12 Jul 2021

The writ petition was filed by seventeen employees of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) working as Group D employees, challenging a promotion ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Process for Assistant Section Officer. Petitioner's claim for promotion fails as he did not meet the eligibility criteria of passing the Higher Standard Departmental Examination under Rule 26 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Service Rules, 2000.

5 Oct 2023

The Petitioner, Rahul Pramod Yadav, was appointed as a Clerk in the Bombay High Court on 18th July 2013. He completed his probation on 6th October 201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Promotion in Cooperative Bank, Reverses High Court's Finding That Rule Amendment Was Invalid. Registrar's Deleting of Rule Barring Technical Employees from Non-Technical Posts Held Valid Under Section 55(1) of Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Read With Section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897.

31 Jul 2026

The dispute arose from a promotion list for the post of Additional Manager in the District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd, Raipur, governed by the Chhat...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)