Search Results for "private space"

699 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 699 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Against Disqualification for Encroachment on Government Land — Interpretation of Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 Requires Encroachment to be on Government Land as Defined Under Land Revenue Code.

The petitioner, Sau. Seema w/o Ramesh Khule, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Gawandgaon in October 2017. Respondent No.4, Nandu s/o Bhikaji ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Caste-Based Abuse Occurred in Private Open Space, Not in Public View, Failing to Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The applicant, Dhananjay Gopalrao Bahergaonkar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...