Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute — Lack of Notice to Original Landowner Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Deemed Conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA cannot be granted without affording opportunity of hearing to the developer who is not a member of the society.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, M/s. K.G. Associates (developer) and its partner, challenged an order dated 17 March 2020 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Competent Authority, Pune, granting deemed conveyance of land admeasuring 77,754.75 sq. mtrs out of Gat No.1420 (Part), Village-Wagholi, Pune, in favor of Respondent No.2-Society (Kamalbaug Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.). The petitioners were the original owners/developers of the land and had appointed an organizer to develop a layout. The society, comprising flat purchasers, applied for deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (MOFA). The Competent Authority granted the deemed conveyance without issuing any notice to the petitioners, who were not members of the society. The petitioners contended that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice. During the pendency of the writ petition, the society registered the deemed conveyance certificate and mutated its name in revenue records, allegedly in breach of an interim order dated 17 December 2020 passed by this court. The court examined the issue of whether the developer, who is not a member of the society, has a right to be heard before deemed conveyance is granted. The court held that the order was passed in gross violation of natural justice as the developer had a legitimate interest in the property and was entitled to notice. The court quashed the deemed conveyance order and the subsequent registration. Regarding the contempt petition, the court found that the society had willfully disobeyed the interim order and issued notice to the society to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated. The court directed the Competent Authority to decide the society's application afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Deemed Conveyance - Natural Justice - Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (MOFA) - The Competent Authority granted deemed conveyance of land to the society without issuing notice to the original landowner/developer who was not a member of the society. The court held that the order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice as the developer had a right to be heard before such an order affecting its rights was passed. The order was quashed and set aside. (Paras 1-10)

B) Contempt of Court - Violation of Interim Order - The society, during pendency of the writ petition, registered the deemed conveyance certificate and got its name mutated in revenue records despite an interim order dated 17 December 2020 restraining such actions. The court found that the society had willfully disobeyed the interim order and issued notice to the society to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated. (Paras 11-15)

C) Co-operative Law - Deemed Conveyance - Rights of Developer - Section 11 MOFA - The court observed that the developer, who is not a member of the society, has a right to be heard before deemed conveyance is granted, as the order affects its ownership rights. The Competent Authority must ensure that all interested parties are given an opportunity of hearing. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order granting deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (MOFA) is valid when passed without notice to the original landowner/developer who is not a member of the society, and whether the subsequent registration of the deemed conveyance certificate and mutation of records violates interim orders of the court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed and set aside the order dated 17 March 2020 granting deemed conveyance and the subsequent registration of the certificate. The court also issued notice to the society to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for violating the interim order dated 17 December 2020. The Competent Authority was directed to decide the society's application afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • deemed conveyance
  • opportunity of hearing
  • co-operative housing society
  • developer rights
  • Section 11 MOFA
  • Section 22 Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 144

WRIT PETITION NO. 8203 OF 2022 ALONGWITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 454 OF 2022

2023-10-04

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

2023:BHC-AS:29025

Mr. Girish S. Godbole, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shruti Tulpule i/by. Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay, for the Petitioners in WP-8203-2022. Mr. Jaydeep S. Deo, for Respondent No.2 in WP-8203/2022 and for Respondent No.1 in CP-454-2022. Mr. C.D. Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 in WP-8203/2022 and for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in CP-454-2022.

M/s. K.G. Associates & anr.

The District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune, City-1 and Competent Authority and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order granting deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA, and contempt petition for alleged violation of interim order.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the deemed conveyance order dated 17 March 2020 and the subsequent registration of the certificate, and action for contempt against the society for violating interim order.

Filing Reason

The Competent Authority granted deemed conveyance without notice to the petitioners, who were the original landowners/developers, violating principles of natural justice. The society also registered the certificate and mutated its name despite an interim stay.

Previous Decisions

The Competent Authority passed the order dated 17 March 2020 granting deemed conveyance. The petitioners filed the writ petition challenging that order. An interim order was passed on 17 December 2020.

Issues

Whether the order granting deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA is valid when passed without notice to the original landowner/developer who is not a member of the society. Whether the society's actions of registering the deemed conveyance certificate and mutating its name in revenue records during pendency of the petition constitute contempt of court.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the deemed conveyance order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice as no notice was given to them, and that the society willfully disobeyed the interim order. Respondent-Society contended that the petitioners were not necessary parties as they were not members of the society, and that the deemed conveyance was validly granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The Competent Authority must afford an opportunity of hearing to the original landowner/developer before granting deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA, even if the developer is not a member of the society, as the order affects the developer's rights. Failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and renders the order void.

Judgment Excerpts

This Writ Petition is filed by Petitioners taking exception to the Order dated 17 March 2020 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Competent Authority, Pune granting deemed conveyance of the land in favour of Respondent No. 2-Society. The order granting deemed conveyance has been passed without any notice to the Petitioners, who are the original owners/developers of the land. This is a gross violation of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The Competent Authority passed the deemed conveyance order on 17 March 2020. The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 8203 of 2022 challenging that order. On 17 December 2020, this court passed an interim order. During pendency, the society registered the deemed conveyance certificate and mutated its name. The petitioners then filed Contempt Petition No. 454 of 2022. The matters were heard and reserved on 15 September 2023, and judgment pronounced on 4 October 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963: Section 11
  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 22
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator in Pending Suits Under Section 8 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies only before filing of first statement o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute — Lack of Notice to Original Landowner Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Deemed Conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA cannot be granted without affording ...