Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Against Disqualification for Encroachment on Government Land — Interpretation of Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 Requires Encroachment to be on Government Land as Defined Under Land Revenue Code.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sau. Seema w/o Ramesh Khule, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Gawandgaon in October 2017. Respondent No.4, Nandu s/o Bhikaji Dakhore, filed an application before the Collector, Akola, on 07/12/2017, alleging that the petitioner and her husband had encroached upon Government land by constructing a house on open land in the layout of Pandit Nehru Backward Class Housing Society. The Collector disqualified the petitioner under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, which disqualifies a person who has encroached upon Government land. The petitioner appealed to the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati, who dismissed the appeal. The petitioner then filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The High Court examined the definition of 'Government land' under Section 2(13) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, which defines it as land vested in or owned by the State Government. The Court found that the land in question had been allotted to the Pandit Nehru Backward Class Housing Society, and therefore ceased to be Government land. The Court noted that the Gram Panchayat record showed the petitioner's name in respect of the land, and the respondent failed to produce any revenue record showing the land as Government land. The Court held that the disqualification provision must be strictly construed and that the burden of proof lay on the respondent, which was not discharged. The Court allowed the petition, quashed the orders of the Collector and Commissioner, and directed that the petitioner be allowed to continue as Sarpanch.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Law - Disqualification of Sarpanch - Encroachment on Government Land - Section 14(1)(j-3) Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 - The petitioner, a Sarpanch, was disqualified for allegedly encroaching on land belonging to a cooperative housing society. The Court held that the land, having been allotted to the society, ceased to be 'Government land' as defined under Section 2(13) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The disqualification provision applies only to encroachment on land owned by the Government, not land owned by a society. The Collector and Commissioner erred in holding otherwise. (Paras 1-18)

B) Evidence - Burden of Proof - Disqualification Proceedings - The burden to prove that the land was Government land lay on the respondent who alleged disqualification. The respondent failed to produce any revenue record showing the land as Government land. The Court noted that the Gram Panchayat record showed the petitioner's name in respect of the land, and the society had been allotted the land. (Paras 10-15)

C) Interpretation of Statutes - Strict Construction of Disqualification Provisions - Section 14(1)(j-3) Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 - Disqualification provisions must be strictly construed. The expression 'Government land' must be given the meaning assigned under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Land allotted to a cooperative society is not Government land. (Paras 12-16)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner incurred disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 for encroaching upon Government land, when the land in question was allotted to a cooperative housing society.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 28/02/2019 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and the order dated 30/08/2018 passed by the Collector, Akola are quashed and set aside. The petitioner is entitled to continue as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Gawandgaon.

Law Points

  • Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act
  • 1959 requires encroachment on 'Government land' as defined under Section 2(13) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code
  • 1966
  • land allotted to a cooperative housing society ceases to be Government land
  • burden of proof lies on the person alleging disqualification.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (02) 123

Writ Petition No. 3551 of 2019

2020-02-21

Manish Pitale J.

Shri. S. D. Chopde for applicant; Shri. N. B. Rathod for respondent No.4; Shri. Nikhil Joshi, AGP for respondents No. 1 and 2

Sau. Seema w/o Ramesh Khule

The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati; The Collector, Akola; The Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Gawnadgaon; Nandu s/o Bhikaji Dakhore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification of Sarpanch under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of orders of Collector and Divisional Commissioner disqualifying her as Sarpanch.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was disqualified on ground of encroaching upon Government land, which she contended was not Government land.

Previous Decisions

Collector, Akola disqualified petitioner; Divisional Commissioner, Amravati dismissed appeal.

Issues

Whether the land encroached upon by the petitioner was 'Government land' within the meaning of Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 read with Section 2(13) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Whether the burden of proof regarding the nature of land was discharged by the respondent.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the land was allotted to a cooperative housing society and thus ceased to be Government land; relied on Shantaram Narayan Raut vs. Additional Commissioner. Respondent argued that the land was Government land and petitioner had encroached upon it, attracting disqualification.

Ratio Decidendi

For disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, the encroachment must be on 'Government land' as defined under Section 2(13) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Land allotted to a cooperative housing society ceases to be Government land. The burden of proof lies on the person alleging disqualification, and strict construction of disqualification provisions is required.

Judgment Excerpts

The expression 'Government land' appearing in Section 14(1)(j-3) of the said Act would have to be given the same meaning as assigned to it under Section 2(13) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The land in question having been allotted to the society, it ceased to be Government land and therefore, the petitioner could not have been disqualified under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the said Act.

Procedural History

Petitioner elected Sarpanch in October 2017. Respondent No.4 filed application on 07/12/2017 before Collector seeking disqualification. Collector passed order on 30/08/2018 disqualifying petitioner. Petitioner appealed to Divisional Commissioner on 28/02/2019, which was dismissed. Petitioner filed writ petition on 03/05/2019, and interim relief was granted. Final judgment on 21/02/2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959: Section 14(1)(j-3), Section 16(2)
  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966: Section 2(13)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Against Disqualification for Encroachment on Government Land — Interpretation of Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 Requires Encroachment to be on Government Land as Defined Un...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'Aerotide' vs 'Ferotide' Found Deceptively Similar. Phonetic and structural similarity between marks for pharmaceutical products justified interim restrai...