High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that failure to send notice to the correct address of the drawer within the prescribed period renders the complaint not maintainable and amounts to abuse of process.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 33
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two criminal petitions filed by the petitioners (accused) under Sections 428 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of proceedings in PCR No.12658/2008 and C.C. No.14063/2012 arising out of PCR No.1879/2009, pending before the IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. The respondent/complainant had filed complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 alleging dishonour of cheques issued by the petitioners. The petitioners contended that the statutory notice under Section 138 was not sent to their correct address and was not within the prescribed period of 30 days from the date of dishonour. The court examined the records and found that the notice was sent to an address that was not the address of the petitioners as per the cheque or as known to the complainant. The court held that the mandatory requirement of sending notice to the correct address was not complied with, and therefore the complaints were not maintainable. The court also noted that the proceedings were an abuse of process of law. Consequently, the court allowed the petitions and quashed the entire proceedings in both cases.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138 - Notice Requirement - The complainant must send a notice in writing to the drawer of the cheque within thirty days of receipt of information of dishonour, demanding payment of the cheque amount. Failure to comply renders the complaint not maintainable. (Paras 5-7)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 - Abuse of Process - Where the statutory notice under Section 138 NI Act is not sent to the correct address of the accused, the criminal proceedings amount to an abuse of process of law and are liable to be quashed. (Paras 8-10)

C) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138 - Address of Drawer - The notice must be sent to the address of the drawer as appearing in the cheque or as known to the complainant. Sending notice to a different address invalidates the notice. (Paras 5-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 are liable to be quashed when the statutory notice was not sent to the correct address of the accused and was not within the prescribed period.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed both criminal petitions and quashed the entire proceedings in PCR No.12658/2008 and C.C. No.14063/2012.

Law Points

  • Notice under Section 138 NI Act must be sent to the correct address of the drawer
  • Notice must be sent within 30 days of dishonour
  • Quashing under Section 482 CrPC for abuse of process
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (10) 45

Criminal Petition No.3757 of 2012 and Criminal Petition No.3756 of 2012

2020-10-09

Justice Ashok G. Nijagannavar

Sri K.R. Krishna Murthy (M/S Lawyers Inc) for petitioners, Sri K. Varaprasad for respondent

Dr. Rajah Vijaya Kumar @ Dr. Kumar @ D.V. Kumar and others

Wg. Cdr (Dr) V.G. Vasishta (Retd)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petitions for quashing proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to set aside the entire proceedings in PCR No.12658/2008 and C.C. No.14063/2012

Filing Reason

Statutory notice under Section 138 NI Act was not sent to the correct address of the accused and not within the prescribed period

Issues

Whether the notice under Section 138 NI Act was sent to the correct address of the drawer? Whether the notice was sent within the prescribed period of 30 days from the date of dishonour? Whether the criminal proceedings are liable to be quashed for non-compliance with mandatory requirements?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the notice was not sent to their correct address and was not within 30 days. Respondent argued that the notice was valid and the proceedings should continue.

Ratio Decidendi

The mandatory requirement under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to send a notice to the correct address of the drawer within 30 days of dishonour is a condition precedent for maintainability of the complaint. Non-compliance renders the proceedings an abuse of process and liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The notice under Section 138 of the NI Act must be sent to the correct address of the drawer. Failure to send notice to the correct address within the prescribed period renders the complaint not maintainable.

Procedural History

The respondent filed PCR No.12658/2008 and PCR No.1879/2009 before the IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Magistrate took cognizance and issued process. The petitioners filed Criminal Petition No.3757/2012 under Section 428 CrPC and Criminal Petition No.3756/2012 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the proceedings. The High Court heard both petitions together and pronounced the order on 09.10.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 428, 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that failure to send notice to the correct ad...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs State to Include College in Centralized Admission Process After AICTE Approval. AICTE Approval for Mechanical Engineering Course Binds State Authorities to Include Institution in Centralized Admission for Academic Year 2011-...