High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), 'A' Bench, Bangalore, dated 30/04/2013. The appeals pertain to assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The respondent-assessee, M/s Skyline Advertising Pvt. Ltd., had deducted tax at source (TDS) but paid it after the end of the previous year, though before the due date for filing the return under Section 139(1). The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenditure under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-payment of TDS within the previous year. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the disallowance. The ITAT, however, deleted the disallowance relying on the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) which allows deduction if TDS is deducted and paid before the due date under Section 139(1). The Revenue appealed to the High Court, contending that the proviso applies only if TDS is paid within the previous year. The High Court dismissed the appeals, holding that the proviso clearly permits deduction if TDS is paid before the due date for filing the return under Section 139(1), and no substantial question of law arises.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) - TDS deducted and paid before due date under Section 139(1) - The issue was whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) can be made when the assessee deducted tax at source but paid it after the end of the previous year but before the due date for filing the return under Section 139(1). The court held that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is deducted and paid before the due date under Section 139(1). The ITAT's order deleting the disallowance was upheld. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the ITAT was correct in deleting the disallowance made under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when the assessee had deducted tax at source but paid it after the end of the previous year but before the due date for filing the return under Section 139(1)?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals dismissed. No substantial question of law. ITAT order upheld.

Law Points

  • Section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • disallowance for non-deduction of TDS
  • proviso allowing deduction if TDS deducted and paid before due date under Section 139(1)
  • substantial question of law
  • appeal under Section 260-A
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (02) 19

ITA No.455/2013, ITA No.454/2013, ITA No.453/2013

2014-02-28

Dilip B. Bhosale, B. Manohar

Sri. Sanmathi E.I. (for appellants), Sri. Nageshwar Rao for PDS Legal (for respondent)

Commissioner of Income Tax-III and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 12(3), Bangalore

M/s Skyline Advertising Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by Revenue under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against ITAT order deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia).

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside ITAT order and restore disallowance.

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by ITAT order deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for TDS paid after end of previous year but before due date under Section 139(1).

Previous Decisions

Assessing Officer disallowed expenditure under Section 40(a)(ia); CIT(A) confirmed disallowance; ITAT deleted disallowance.

Issues

Whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) can be made when TDS is deducted and paid before due date under Section 139(1)?

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) requires TDS to be paid within the previous year. Assessee argued that proviso allows deduction if TDS paid before due date under Section 139(1).

Ratio Decidendi

The proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, allows deduction of expenditure if tax deducted at source is paid before the due date for filing the return under Section 139(1). Payment after the end of the previous year but before that due date does not attract disallowance.

Judgment Excerpts

The proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, allows deduction if TDS is deducted and paid before the due date under Section 139(1). No substantial question of law arises.

Procedural History

Assessing Officer disallowed expenditure under Section 40(a)(ia) for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. CIT(A) confirmed disallowance. ITAT deleted disallowance. Revenue filed appeals under Section 260-A before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 40(a)(ia), Section 139(1), Section 260-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reduces Compensation for Constructed Portion Due to Lack of Evidence. Reference Court's Enhancement Based on CSR Rates 1990 Set Aside for Constructed Area, Uphe...