Search Results for "principal employer liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "principal employer liability"

438 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of Employee Due to Lack of Safety Measures. Employer and Principal Employer Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

23 Aug 2025

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the legal representatives of the deceased Chinnaswamy, who died due to electrocution on 14.08.2013 while workin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Employer for Unfair Labour Practice Under Section 48(1) of MRTU and PULP Act for Non-Compliance of Reinstatement Order. The court held that mens rea is not essential for an offence under Section 48(1) and that the applicant, being in charge of the trust, was liable for non-compliance of the Labour Court's reinstatement order.

1 Oct 2020

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Father Jerome Gonsalves, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 48(...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.

4 Oct 2024

The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...

High Court

High Court Directs State to Pay Back Wages in Teacher Reinstatement Case Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules. The court held that the state government must bear the liability for back wages as per the School Tribunal's order, since the Tribunal did not specify the payer and the management had already deposited funds as directed.

23 Mar 2026

The dispute involved an education society and its college as petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and a teacher as respondents. The teacher wa...

High Court

Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.

21 Jan 2025

The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Remedy Under Industrial Disputes Act Is Available to Non-Teaching Staff of Private School in View of Exclusive Remedy Under MEPS Act. Labour Court Had Dismissed References as Not Maintainable Citing Adarsh Shikshan Sanstha and St. Ulai High School Decisions.

9 Dec 2016

Two writ petitions were filed by non-teaching staff of a private school challenging Labour Court awards that dismissed their references under the Indu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ESI Recovery Against Auction Purchaser in Deemed Transfer Case — Section 93-A of ESI Act Does Not Apply to Sales by Financial Corporation Under Section 29(2) of SFC Act. Auction purchaser of property from Maharashtra State Financial Corporation is not liable for prior owner's ESI arrears as the transfer is by operation of law and not by the employer.

21 Feb 2006

The petitioner, M/s. ANK Seals, a registered partnership firm, purchased a plot of land and building (U-149 in MIDC, Nagpur) in an auction sale conduc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Occupier in Factory Fatality Case, Quashes Criminal Complaint for Lack of Vicarious Liability. Occupier of Patanjali Foods Limited not vicariously liable under Sections 92, 94, 101 of Factories Act, 1948 as complaint lacked specific allegations of negligence or knowledge regarding fatal accident of worker Rajendra Dewade.

15 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Ram Bharat, occupier of Patanjali Foods Limited, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read wi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Workmen Compensation Cases — Upholds Commissioner's Award of Compensation with Interest. Employer's Failure to Discharge Burden of Proof Regarding Non-Employment Results in Liability Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

25 Aug 2015

The case involves four miscellaneous first appeals filed by the Branch Manager of National Insurance Company Limited, Raichur, against the judgments a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable as Deceased Was Not a Workman Under Section 2(n) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The court held that the deceased was casually engaged and not a workman under the Act, reversing the Commissioner's order.

30 Jun 2015

The case arises from a claim for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 filed by the parents (respondents 1 and 2) of the deceased La...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)