Bombay High Court Quashes ESI Recovery Against Auction Purchaser in Deemed Transfer Case — Section 93-A of ESI Act Does Not Apply to Sales by Financial Corporation Under Section 29(2) of SFC Act. Auction purchaser of property from Maharashtra State Financial Corporation is not liable for prior owner's ESI arrears as the transfer is by operation of law and not by the employer.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. ANK Seals, a registered partnership firm, purchased a plot of land and building (U-149 in MIDC, Nagpur) in an auction sale conducted by the Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC) under Section 29(2) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. The property previously belonged to M/s. J.J. Cold Tread, which had defaulted on loans from MSFC. After the purchase, the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) issued notices dated 21.10.1995 and 7.12.1995 demanding payment of ESI arrears of M/s. J.J. Cold Tread, treating the petitioner as a 'deemed transferee' under Section 93-A of the ESI Act, 1948, and threatening coercive recovery under Sections 45-C to 45-I of the ESI Act. The petitioner challenged these notices by way of a writ petition. The court framed the issue whether an auction purchaser from a Financial Corporation under Section 29(2) of the SFC Act can be held liable for the prior owner's ESI dues under Section 93-A of the ESI Act. The petitioner argued that the sale was by operation of law and not a voluntary transfer by the employer, and that Section 93-A only applies to transfers by the employer himself. The ESIC contended that the deeming provision in Section 93-A covers all transfers, including those by a Financial Corporation. The court analyzed Section 93-A, which deems a transfer of a business by an employer to be a transfer of liability for ESI dues, and Section 29(2) of the SFC Act, which empowers the Financial Corporation to take over and sell the assets of a defaulting borrower. The court held that the deeming provision in Section 93-A does not extend to a sale by a Financial Corporation under Section 29(2), as such a sale is a statutory sale and not a transfer by the employer. The purchaser acquires the property free from prior liabilities, including ESI dues, unless the statute expressly provides otherwise. The court quashed the impugned notices and directed the ESIC not to recover the arrears from the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Employees' State Insurance - Deemed Transfer - Section 93-A ESI Act, 1948 - Auction Sale by Financial Corporation - The court considered whether an auction purchaser from a Financial Corporation under Section 29(2) of the SFC Act, 1951, is a 'deemed transferee' under Section 93-A of the ESI Act. Held that the deeming provision in Section 93-A does not apply to such sales, as the transfer is by operation of law and not by the employer, and the purchaser is not a successor of the business. The ESI Corporation cannot recover arrears from the auction purchaser. (Paras 1-10)

B) State Financial Corporation - Sale Under Section 29(2) - Nature of Transfer - Section 29(2) SFC Act, 1951 - The court examined the nature of a sale by the Financial Corporation under Section 29(2). Held that such a sale is a statutory sale and not a voluntary transfer by the employer. The purchaser acquires clean title free from prior encumbrances, including ESI dues, unless specifically provided by law. (Paras 5-8)

C) Employees' State Insurance - Recovery of Arrears - Section 45-C to 45-I ESI Act, 1948 - The court held that the ESI Corporation's coercive recovery proceedings against the auction purchaser for the prior owner's dues were without jurisdiction. The purchaser cannot be treated as a 'transferee' under Section 93-A, and the recovery provisions under Sections 45-C to 45-I do not apply to such a purchaser. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a purchaser of land and building in an auction sale conducted by the Maharashtra State Financial Corporation under Section 29(2) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, can be treated as a 'deemed transferee' under Section 93-A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and thus be liable for the prior owner's ESI arrears.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned orders and proceedings, and directed the ESIC not to recover the arrears from the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Deemed transfer under Section 93-A of ESI Act does not include auction sale by Financial Corporation under Section 29(2) of SFC Act
  • 1951
  • ESI dues not attach to property purchased in auction
  • no liability of purchaser for prior owner's dues
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (02) 68

Writ Petition No. 536 of 1996

2006-02-21

J. N. Patel, A.H. Joshi

Shri Anil Padiyar for petitioner, Mrs. Maldhure for respondent nos. 1 & 2, Mr. M.V. Dhareshwar for respondent nos. 3 & 4

M/s. ANK Seals

Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging recovery notices for ESI dues against auction purchaser

Remedy Sought

Quashing of orders dated 21.10.1995 and 7.12.1995 and proceedings initiated by respondent no.2 for recovery of ESI arrears of M/s. J.J. Cold Tread from the petitioner

Filing Reason

Petitioner purchased land and building in auction from MSFC; ESIC treated it as deemed transfer under Section 93-A and demanded arrears

Issues

Whether an auction purchaser from a Financial Corporation under Section 29(2) of SFC Act is a 'deemed transferee' under Section 93-A of ESI Act and liable for prior owner's ESI dues.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: The sale was by operation of law, not a voluntary transfer by the employer; Section 93-A does not apply; purchaser gets clean title. Respondent ESIC: The deeming provision in Section 93-A covers all transfers, including those by a Financial Corporation; purchaser is liable.

Ratio Decidendi

A sale by a Financial Corporation under Section 29(2) of the SFC Act, 1951, is a statutory sale and not a transfer by the employer. The deeming provision in Section 93-A of the ESI Act, 1948, does not apply to such sales, and the auction purchaser is not liable for the prior owner's ESI arrears.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 21.10.1995 passed by the respondent no.2... calling upon the petitioner to clear off the arrears of E.S.I. dues of M/s. J.J. Cold Tread... It is the case of the petitioner that it is a registered firm and deals with the business of manufacturing hydraulic pneumatic seals... in response to the auction sale conducted by respondent nos. 3 & 4, the petitioner purchased plot U-149...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 1996 challenging the ESI recovery notices dated 21.10.1995 and 7.12.1995. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 21.02.2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948: 93-A, 45-C, 45-D, 45-E, 45-F, 45-G, 45-H, 45-I
  • State Financial Corporation Act, 1951: 29(2)
  • Income-Tax Act, 1961: II Schedule
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes ESI Recovery Against Auction Purchaser in Deemed Transfer Case — Section 93-A of ESI Act Does Not Apply to Sales by Financial Corporation Under Section 29(2) of SFC Act. Auction purchaser of property from Maharashtra State...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Direction on Teacher Eligibility Test for Pre-RTE Act Teachers in Review Petitions. In-service teachers recruited before RTE Act with more than 5 years to retirement must qualify TET within 2 years, but those with less than 5 y...