Search Results for "Temple Shop"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Temple Shop"

333 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 333 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposed of Batch Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout at Bangalore. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.

11 Jul 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Granting FL-III Licence in Residential Colony — Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Police Reports and Residents' Objections Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

27 Jun 2012

The petitioners, residents of Vidarbha Housing Board Colony, Raghuji Nagar, Nagpur, challenged the order dated 30.10.2010 passed by the State Governme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 Under Section 17(1) and (3) of BDA Act and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Under Section 19(1).

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition by Bangalore Development Authority for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Landlord failed to prove bonafide requirement and unlawful subletting under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

24 Jul 2015

The petitioners, owners of a property in Thane, filed a suit for eviction of the respondents from a gala (shop) on grounds of default in rent, unlawfu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal in Eviction Suit — Unregistered Memorandum of Oral Partition Held Admissible to Prove Ownership. The court ruled that an unregistered memorandum of oral partition is admissible under Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908 for collateral purpose of proving title, and that the appellant failed to raise substantial question of law in second appeal.

11 Jan 2010

The case involves a second appeal filed by Mahesh Shivlal Shahu (appellant) against the judgment and order dated 11.9.2009 passed by the District Judg...

High Court

KAHC010364002010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)