Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1743 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1743 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010122492015_1

The writ appeal arises from an order dated 29.09.2015 passed by a Single Judge in W.P.No.42727/2013 (SC/ST) which dismissed the writ petition challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Repealed Penalty Rule Cannot Apply: The Supreme Court Upholds Application of Amended Rule in Excise Penalty Case

The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd, holding that penalties for exceeding permissible limits of liquor wastage du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Based on Ex-Parte US Default Judgment — Foreign Decree Not a Debt Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 Without Satisfying Conditions for Enforcement in India.

The petitioner, Marine Geotechnics LLC, an American company, obtained an ex-parte default judgment against the respondent, Coastal Marine Construction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Encashment in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Fraud or Irretrievable Injustice Must Be Established for Injunction Against Bank Guarantees Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Felguera Gruas India Private Limited (FGIPL), entered into contracts with the first respondent, Tuticorin Coal Terminal Private Limited...