Search Results for "bid price modification"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses NHAI Appeal in Highway Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitral Award for Additional Costs and Embankment Work Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

The appellant, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), awarded a contract to the respondent for construction of the Allahabad Bypass Project. Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Housing Project. Developer's liability to refund allottees upheld due to breach of construction timeline under Tripartite Agreement, with consumer fora jurisdiction affirmed despite arbitration clause.

The dispute arose from a housing project named 'Pride Asia' in Chandigarh, where the Chandigarh Housing Board (CHB) was appointed as the nodal agency ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Bidders to Be from SC/ST Community. Condition Held Valid as Affirmative Action for Upliftment of SC/ST Communities, Not Violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, eleven pump manufacturing companies, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a tend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Carrying Cost in Change in Law Claims Under PPA — Restitutionary Principle Upheld. Article 13.2 of Power Purchase Agreement Entitles Generating Company to Carrying Cost from Date of Change in Law Till Approval.

The case involves appeals by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Haryana Discoms) and Gujarat Urja Vika...