High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Bidders to Be from SC/ST Community. Condition Held Valid as Affirmative Action for Upliftment of SC/ST Communities, Not Violative of Article 14.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, eleven pump manufacturing companies, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a tender notification issued by the Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Development Corporation Limited (respondents 3 to 5) for the supply of pumps. The tender notification contained a condition that only bidders belonging to the Scheduled Caste (SC) or Scheduled Tribe (ST) community were eligible to participate. The petitioners, who did not belong to SC/ST communities, contended that this condition was arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. They argued that the condition had no nexus with the object of the tender, which was to procure pumps at the best price, and that it unfairly excluded them from competing. The respondents defended the condition, stating that it was intended to promote the economic upliftment of SC/ST communities, which was the very object of the Corporation. The court, after hearing arguments, held that the condition was a reasonable classification based on an intelligible differentia (caste) and had a rational nexus with the object of uplifting SC/ST communities. The court noted that the Corporation was established specifically for the development of SC/ST communities, and the tender condition was a form of affirmative action permissible under the Constitution. The court further held that the scope of judicial review in tender matters is limited, and unless the condition is arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide, the court should not interfere. The condition was found to be neither arbitrary nor discriminatory. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Article 14 - Reasonable Classification - Tender Condition - The condition in the tender notification that only bidders belonging to SC/ST community are eligible to participate is a reasonable classification based on intelligible differentia and has a rational nexus with the object of upliftment of SC/ST communities. The condition does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. (Paras 10-15)

B) Tender Law - Judicial Review - Tender Conditions - The court's scope of judicial review in tender matters is limited to examining whether the conditions are arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide. The condition requiring bidders to be from SC/ST community is not arbitrary as it is intended to promote the welfare of SC/ST communities. (Paras 10-15)

C) Affirmative Action - Tender - SC/ST - The tender condition restricting eligibility to SC/ST bidders is a form of affirmative action permissible under the Constitution to uplift the SC/ST communities. The condition is valid and does not suffer from any legal infirmity. (Paras 10-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the tender condition restricting eligibility to bidders belonging to SC/ST community is arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. The tender condition requiring bidders to be from SC/ST community is valid and not violative of Article 14.

Law Points

  • Tender condition requiring bidders to be from SC/ST community is valid
  • Article 14 not violated
  • classification based on caste for affirmative action permissible
  • no arbitrariness in tender condition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (12) 21

Writ Petition No.50906 of 2019 (GM-TEN)

2019-12-04

B. Veerappa

Sri Vijaya Shankar, Senior Counsel for Sri M.Shivaprakash, Advocate (for petitioners); Sri Vijay Kumar A Patil, AGA for R1 & R2; Sri Gururaj Joshi, Advocate for R3 to R5

M/s. Atalanta Pumps Pvt. Ltd. and others

The State of Karnataka and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging tender condition restricting eligibility to SC/ST bidders.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the tender condition and direction to allow them to participate.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, who are not from SC/ST communities, were excluded from participating in the tender due to the condition.

Issues

Whether the tender condition restricting eligibility to SC/ST bidders is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the condition is arbitrary, discriminatory, and has no nexus with the object of the tender. Respondents argued that the condition is a valid affirmative action measure to uplift SC/ST communities.

Ratio Decidendi

A tender condition restricting eligibility to SC/ST bidders is a reasonable classification based on intelligible differentia and has a rational nexus with the object of uplifting SC/ST communities. Such affirmative action is permissible under Article 14 and does not amount to discrimination.

Judgment Excerpts

The condition in the tender notification that only bidders belonging to SC/ST community are eligible to participate is a reasonable classification based on intelligible differentia and has a rational nexus with the object of upliftment of SC/ST communities. The court's scope of judicial review in tender matters is limited to examining whether the conditions are arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the tender condition. The court heard arguments and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Bidders to Be from SC/ST Community. Condition Held Valid as Affirmative Action for Upliftment of SC/ST Communities, Not Violative of Article 14.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Extension of Time to Comply with Amended Schedule M of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. Court holds that granting extension of time to comply with delegated legislation is outside the scope of Article 226 ...