WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022
2 May 2025The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...
Search Results for "Project Affected Person"
772 result(s) found
Found 772 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.
3 Sep 2024The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...
- 556
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal in RERA Interest Case for Delayed Possession. Builder directed to pay interest at SBI MCLR plus 2% from 1 January 2018 till possession for delay in handing over flats in slum rehabilitation project.
14 Mar 2024The case involves a Second Appeal filed by Era Realtors Private Limited (Appellant) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Trib...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Project Affected Persons Seeking Alternate Land Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Failure to Issue Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) of the 1999 Act Violated Petitioners' Right to Rehabilitation; Court Directs Issuance of Notice and Allotment of Alternate Land Upon Deposit of 65% Compensation.
19 Jul 2023The petitioners, claiming to be project affected persons, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to t...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established as Owner of Acquired Lands. Petitioner claiming tenancy cannot challenge acquisition without established title.
6 Jan 2023The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Alternate Land for Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court Directs State to Issue Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) and Consider Claim for Alternate Land for Lands Submerged Under Mahind Pond Project.
8 Dec 2022The petitioners, legal heirs of Maruti Ganu Supnekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cour...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Bombay Passes Interim Orders Directing Restoration of Lake and Prevention of Mangrove Destruction in Navi Mumbai. Modification of Development Plan to Permit Golf Course Raised Public Interest Concerns.
1 Nov 2018The public interest litigations were filed to address the systematic destruction of mangroves and wetlands in Navi Mumbai. The petitioners in PIL 218/...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retrenched Worker Seeking Absorption as Permanent Employee in University — Land Acquisition for Research Centre Entitles Displaced Person to Preference in Employment Under Section 40 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeth) Act, 1960.
11 Sep 2014The petitioner, Sumanbai Bhaurao Shinde, a retrenched worker of the respondent Marathwada Agricultural University, filed a writ petition seeking direc...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.
24 Jun 2014The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Petitioner Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 23(1-A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for Delayed Possession. Landowner's Claim for Additional Amount for Period Between Notification and Possession Upheld.
5 Dec 2006The petitioner, Bhausaheb Vishwanath Murkute, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Auran...
- 98
