WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition proceedings for the rehabilitation of persons affected by the Dudhganga Irrigation Project. Their land, bearing Gat No. 156, was notified for acquisition in 1990 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners alleged discriminatory treatment by the State authorities, asserting that similarly placed landowners should be treated equally. The High Court, in its oral judgment, highlighted the foundational principles of rule of law, equality before law, and the right to property. It observed that the State must apply the law uniformly and take corrective action when breaches of constitutional rights occur. The court noted that the case raised common issues of fact and law, and with consent of parties, it proceeded to hear the matters finally. However, the provided judgment text is incomplete and does not include the court's final decision or directions. Therefore, the outcome and specific relief granted remain unknown. The court's strong remarks on discrimination and the State's duties underscore the constitutional framework protecting property rights and equal treatment.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Equality and Non-Discrimination - Article 14 and 300A, Constitution of India - Land Acquisition - The Court emphasized that in a rule of law society, there can be no discrimination; likes must be treated alike, and the State has a duty to apply law uniformly and correct breaches of constitutional rights. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State's actions in the land acquisition for the Dudhganga Irrigation Project rehabilitation resulted in discrimination and violation of the petitioners' rights under Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • equality before the law
  • equal protection of the laws
  • right to property
  • non-discrimination
  • rule of law
  • state's duty to apply law uniformly
  • Article 14
  • Article 300A
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (05) 7

Writ Petition No. 4987 of 2022 along with connected petitions (WP 4991/2022, 4988/2022, 11372/2022, 15996/2022)

2025-05-02

G. S. Kulkarni, Somasekhar Sundaresan

2025:BHC-AS:19937-DB

Nitin P. Deshpande, Kanchan Phatak, Rachana Harpale for the petitioners; S. B. Kalel, AGP for the respondents

Sumitra Shridhar Khane (lead petitioner) along with others as petitioners in connected petitions

The Deputy Collector, Spl. Land Acquisition No.12, Kolhapur; Deputy Collector (Rehabilitation) Kolhapur; Collector, Kolhapur; State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 challenging land acquisition proceedings alleging discrimination and violation of property rights.

Filing Reason

Land of the petitioners was notified for acquisition for rehabilitation of Dudhganga Irrigation Project affected persons, allegedly with discriminatory treatment.

Issues

Whether the State discriminated against the petitioners in the land acquisition process, violating Articles 14 and 300A.

Judgment Excerpts

In a society governed by the rule of law, there can be no discrimination in the application of law to persons who are similarly placed. It is the solemn duty and responsibility of the State to uniformly apply the law, as also take corrective actions when it is noticed that the State’s actions are in breach of law and the constitutional rights. These issues, which stem from the guarantee of equality of rights and the constitutional recognition of a right not to be deprived of property, save by authority of law, confronts us in the present proceedings. The petitioner is the owner of land bearing Gat No.156 admeasuring 1 H. 12 R. situated at village Vhanur, Tal. Kagal, District-Kolhapur.

Procedural History

Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution; court issued Rule; respondents waived service; by consent, heard finally.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4
  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 14, Article 300A, Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case — Quarrel Between Neighbors Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC. The court held that the mere allegation of calling the deceased a prostitute does not constitute insti...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders in Debt Recovery Proceedings Against Dr. Vijay Mallya. Court upholds the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal to proceed with recovery actions under the Recovery of Debts D...