Search Results for "Cut-off Date"

225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tribunal Order in Seniority Dispute — Seniority List Must Include All Eligible Employees as on Cut-off Date.

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjay Atmaram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 2/12/2009 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Pensionary Benefits Due to Disputed Fact and Lack of Legal Heir's Right to Pension. Option to Continue Existing Scale for Pension Purposes Was Allegedly Given After Cut-Off Date, and Legal Heirs Have No Independent Right to Pension.

The petitioner, originally Sumanbai Kurdukar (since deceased, represented by legal heir Raghvendra Joshi), filed a writ petition seeking directions to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Deputy Commissioner's Order Rejecting Regularization of Unauthorized Occupation. Petitioner failed to discharge burden of proving possession prior to cut-off date under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Shri B. Laxmikhanth Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election Authority's Order Excluding Primary Milk Societies from Voters List for Federal Society Elections. Cut-off Date for Membership Eligibility Must Be Prospective and Not Retrospective Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, two primary milk cooperative societies, were members of the respondent no.4 federal society (Pune Zillha Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Discriminatory Cut-off Date in Pension Revision for Pre-1996 Retired Judicial Officers. Government Resolution Denying Revised Pension to Pre-1996 Retirees Violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Raghavendra Anantrai Mehta, a retired District and Sessions Judge who retired on 30th September 1991, filed a writ petition under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Medical Graduates to Participate in NEET PG 2018-19 Counselling After Revaluation of Internship Marks — Held that denial of opportunity to participate in counselling due to erroneous computation of internship marks violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by medical graduates who were denied participation in the NEET PG 2018-19 counselling process due ...