The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of applicants who challenged the termination of their appointments due to a dispute over certification qualifications. The judgment addressed the eligibility criteria for Technical Grade-II (Electrical) positions in Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL). The applicants were initially terminated based on the requirement of a CCC certificate from DOEACC/NIELIT. The Court held that candidates who had CCC certification from DOEACC/NIELIT at the time of their interview met the eligibility requirements and should be reinstated with continuity of service, though without back wages.

Acts and Sections Discussed

1. Article 16 of the Indian Constitution - Fundamental rights regarding equal opportunity in public employment.
2. Article 142 of the Indian Constitution - Power of the Supreme Court to issue orders for complete justice.
3. U.P. State Power Parishad Operative Employees Cadre Service Regulations, 1995 - Prescribing qualifications for UPPCL positions.
4. Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 - Pertinent to the restructuring of UPPCL.

1. Background of Employment and Termination

The case arose from UPPCL's advertisement in 2014 for Technical Grade-II (Electrical) positions. Applicants were required to hold a CCC certificate or an equivalent computer qualification. Despite possessing CCC certification by the time of the interview, certain candidates were terminated based on the alleged failure to meet certification requirements by the application deadline.

2. Regulatory Amendments and Certification Requirements

UPPCL's regulations initially mandated the CCC certificate for the Technician Grade-II post. Amendments in 2011 specified that equivalent certifications could be considered. The advertisement in 2014 reinforced these requirements, but later scrutiny and litigation questioned the eligibility of candidates with certifications obtained post-application but pre-interview.

3. High Court Proceedings and Judgment

Unsuccessful candidates filed writs challenging the selection process. The Single Judge upheld the requirement for recognized qualifications and ordered UPPCL to revise the selection list, excluding candidates without DOEACC/NIELIT certification. However, the Division Bench later reversed this, accepting self-certified qualifications.

4. Supreme Court Intervention and Final Judgment

The Supreme Court ultimately upheld the Single Judge's findings, affirming that DOEACC/NIELIT certification was mandatory. The Court emphasized that candidates with CCC certificates by the interview date should not be excluded from the merit list and ordered their reinstatement.

Ratio Decidendi:

The Supreme Court determined that the intent behind the recruitment policy was to ensure recognized qualifications for public service positions, as stipulated by UPPCL's amended regulations. It found that CCC certification from NIELIT met this criterion, affirming that applicants with this qualification at the interview date were eligible. The Court applied Article 142 to provide relief, directing reinstatement without back wages.

Subjects:

Employment Law, Public Service Qualifications, Judicial Review

Public Employment, Certification Eligibility, Technical Grade-II, UPPCL, Supreme Court Judgment