Bombay High Court Allows Medical Graduates to Participate in NEET PG 2018-19 Counselling After Revaluation of Internship Marks — Held that denial of opportunity to participate in counselling due to erroneous computation of internship marks violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by medical graduates who were denied participation in the NEET PG 2018-19 counselling process due to the delayed completion of their compulsory rotatory internship. The petitioners had completed their MBBS and appeared for NEET PG 2018, but their internship completion was delayed because the marks awarded for their internship were re-evaluated by their respective colleges, resulting in a revised internship completion date after the cut-off date of 31st March 2018 prescribed by the Medical Council of India (MCI). The petitioners argued that the delay was not their fault but arose from the revaluation process initiated by the colleges. They sought directions to be allowed to participate in the counselling process, including the stray vacancy round. The respondents, including the Union of India and the MCI, opposed the petitions, contending that the cut-off date was fixed and could not be relaxed. The court analyzed the facts and found that the petitioners had completed all academic requirements except the internship, and the delay was solely due to the revaluation of internship marks by the colleges. The court held that denying the petitioners the opportunity to participate in counselling would be arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The court directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to participate in the stray vacancy round of NEET PG 2018-19 counselling and to consider them as eligible for the academic year 2018-19. The court also directed that the petitioners be accommodated in available seats, if any, or in the next academic year if necessary.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Equality - Article 14 - Denial of Participation in Counselling - Petitioners were denied participation in NEET PG 2018-19 counselling due to delayed internship completion caused by revaluation of internship marks - Court held that the denial was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 as the delay was not attributable to the petitioners but to the revaluation process - Directed respondents to allow petitioners to participate in the stray vacancy round (Paras 5-10).

B) Medical Education - NEET PG Counselling - Internship Completion - Cut-off Date - The cut-off date for internship completion was 31st March 2018, but petitioners completed internship later due to revaluation - Court held that the cut-off date cannot be applied rigidly when the delay is due to administrative reasons - Directed that petitioners be considered as eligible for the academic year 2018-19 (Paras 7-9).

C) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Article 21 - Right to Practice Profession - Denial of opportunity to pursue postgraduate medical education affects the right to livelihood - Court held that the petitioners' right to practice as specialists is protected under Article 21 - Directed respondents to accommodate petitioners in available seats (Paras 8-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, who completed their internship after the cut-off date due to revaluation of their internship marks, are entitled to participate in the NEET PG 2018-19 counselling process.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to participate in the stray vacancy round of NEET PG 2018-19 counselling and to consider them as eligible for the academic year 2018-19. The court also directed that the petitioners be accommodated in available seats, if any, or in the next academic year if necessary.

Law Points

  • Right to participate in counselling
  • Revaluation of marks
  • Internship marks computation
  • Article 14
  • Article 21
  • NEET PG counselling
  • Medical Council of India regulations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (02) 106

Writ Petition No.5343 of 2018 with Interim Application No.77 of 2021 and connected matters

2021-07-01

Anita Kishanrao Videkar, Dr. Rajiv Vasant Kulkarni, Dr. Archana Shaunakbhai Patel, Dr. Shriram Nikhil Govardhan, Dr. Sayali Shankar Tidke, Keyur Raghuvendra Chakurwar, Dr. Prashant Narsingarao Biradar, Dr. Jigneshkumar Kantilal Gadhia, Dr. Gaurav Chhabra

Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging denial of participation in NEET PG 2018-19 counselling due to delayed internship completion caused by revaluation of internship marks.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought directions to be allowed to participate in the NEET PG 2018-19 counselling process, including the stray vacancy round.

Filing Reason

Petitioners completed their MBBS and appeared for NEET PG 2018, but their internship completion was delayed because their internship marks were re-evaluated by their colleges, resulting in a revised internship completion date after the cut-off date of 31st March 2018.

Issues

Whether the petitioners, who completed their internship after the cut-off date due to revaluation of their internship marks, are entitled to participate in the NEET PG 2018-19 counselling process. Whether the denial of participation in counselling violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the delay in internship completion was not their fault but due to revaluation of internship marks by their colleges, and they should not be penalized for the same. Respondents argued that the cut-off date of 31st March 2018 was fixed and could not be relaxed, and the petitioners were not eligible for counselling.

Ratio Decidendi

The denial of opportunity to participate in NEET PG counselling due to a delay in internship completion caused by revaluation of internship marks is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The cut-off date cannot be applied rigidly when the delay is attributable to administrative reasons beyond the control of the candidates.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners have completed their MBBS and appeared for NEET PG 2018, but their internship completion was delayed because the marks awarded for their internship were re-evaluated by their respective colleges. The denial of opportunity to participate in counselling would be arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The court directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to participate in the stray vacancy round of NEET PG 2018-19 counselling.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed in 2018 challenging the denial of participation in NEET PG 2018-19 counselling. Interim applications were filed in 2021 seeking directions. The court heard the matters and delivered judgment on 1st July 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Regularisation of Temporary Teacher's Service. Petitioner failed to establish continuous service of 240 days in a year as required under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for regularisation.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice for Royalty on Steatite Extraction in Violation of Affidavit Condition — Petitioner's Use of Mineral for Decorative Blocks Not Proved to Be for Cottage Industry. Affidavit Undertaking Not Incorporated i...