The case revolves around the eligibility of Eka Academy Private Limited to avail benefits under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS). The petitioner claimed that their service tax dues for the financial years 2014-2015 to 2017-2018 were quantified before the critical date of June 30, 2019. However, the tax authorities rejected their claim, stating that the dues were not properly quantified by the cutoff date, disqualifying them from the scheme. The court ruled in favor of Eka Academy, acknowledging that the dues were indeed quantified on time and directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's application under the scheme by September 30, 2024.

1. Background of the Case

• Parties Involved: Eka Academy Private Limited vs. Tax Authorities
• Issue: Eligibility for the SVLDRS based on the quantification of service tax dues before the cutoff date.

2. Petitioner's Claim

• Quantification of Dues: Eka Academy claimed that their service tax dues, amounting to ₹22,00,414, were quantified in a letter dated May 6, 2019.
• Scheme Eligibility: The petitioner argued that this quantification before June 30, 2019, made them eligible for the SVLDRS benefits.

3. Respondent's Rejection

• Reason for Rejection: The tax department rejected the claim, asserting that the dues were not correctly quantified by the cutoff date, thus disqualifying the petitioner under Section 125(1)(e) of the SVLDRS.

4. Court's Analysis and Decision

• Precedents Considered: The court considered previous cases (Thought Blurb and Joseph Daniel Massey) that supported the petitioner's stance.
• Ruling: The court found that the dues were indeed quantified before the critical date and directed the tax authorities to reassess the petitioner's application under the SVLDRS by September 30, 2024.

5. Conclusion

• Outcome: The court quashed the show cause notice and previous orders against Eka Academy, allowing them to benefit from the SVLDRS.
• Future Directive: The respondents are required to form a committee to address the petitioner's declaration in line with the court's judgment.