Search Results for "foreign judgment enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "foreign judgment enforcement"

775 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 775 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

21 Dec 2015

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Challenge to Acquisition for Waghur Project Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' acceptance of compensation without protest for nearly 20 years bars them from challenging the acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

7 Oct 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for the Waghur Project in Jalgaon, Maharashtra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Licensing Conditions on Orchestra Bars Under Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Gender-Based Numerical Restrictions on Performers Held Valid as Reasonable Restrictions in Public Interest Under Article 19(6) of the Constitution.

18 Feb 2022

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Bombay that upheld conditions imposed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on orchestr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Eligibility Communication Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Interpretation of Section 9(c) of DTVSV Act: Pending criminal proceedings without charge-sheet or not relating to tax matters do not bar eligibility.

23 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a communication dated 21st October 2020 issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

7 May 2010

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Issues Judgment in W.A.No.1319/2018 and Connected Appeals Regarding Disqualification of MLAs for Defection. The Court Evaluates Whether Single Judge Erred in Directing Speaker to Decide Disqualification Petition Within a Fixed Time.

7 May 2018

The Karnataka High Court division bench heard intra-Court appeals filed against the order dated 24.04.2018 of a single Judge in W.P. Nos. 12338-12339/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.

9 Sep 2014

The Bombay High Court heard a central excise appeal filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V. The appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Recovery Suit as Time-Barred Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Claim for Damages for Short Delivery of Goods Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period Under Article 11 of Limitation Act, 1963.

12 Aug 2005

The appeal was filed by Reliance Industries Limited against the order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, dated 21/3/1998, rejecting the plai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

27 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

57 58 59 60 61

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)