Search Results for "material procedural irregularity"

611 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 611 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Appeal to High Court for Non-Compliance with Section 260A Procedure. The High Court failed to frame substantial questions of law as mandated under Section 260A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, leading to procedural irregularity.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the Bombay High Court's order dismissing the Revenue's appeal und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Developer Selection in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Tenants of Municipal Corporation Held Ineligible to Vote. The court upheld the selection of developer by General Body Meeting, finding no procedural irregularity in service of notice or conduct of meeting.

The petitioners, claiming to be eligible slum dwellers, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.7 as developer for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Commission's Direction to Register Revision as Appeal in Consumer Dispute — Section 47(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Does Not Permit Revision Against Final Order of District Commission; Appeal is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioner, Harish Ramesh Gawai, a director of Laxmi Swapnapurti Planners & Developers Private Limited, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Applications Challenging Order to Remove Encroachments from Suit Property in Partition Suit. Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC to Direct Removal of Encroachments During Pendency of Suit to Preserve Subject Matter of Suit.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by the applicants (original defendants) challenging an order dated 30/04/2019 passed by the Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Due to Procedural Irregularity. Rule 6(2) proviso requiring pre-deposit of 50% of disputed tax before filing declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 read down as directory, not mandatory.

The petitioner, Nabeel Construction Pvt. Ltd., engaged in construction services, was subjected to an investigation by the Directorate General of GST I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Independent Reasoning Renders Appellate Judgment Unsustainable.

The appellant, Bhausaheb R. Sanap, was defendant No.5 in Regular Civil Suit No.81 of 2000 filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Ratnabai and Satyabhamabai)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Labour Court Award in MSRTC Employee Back Wages Case — Full Back Wages Reduced to 50% Due to Employee's Laches and Delay in Prosecuting Remedy. Employee's removal under unconstitutional regulation did not automatically entitle full back wages; conduct and delay relevant.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the Labour Court's award dated 18/10/2008 in IDA Reference No. 4/2007...