Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2684 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2684 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandamus to Enforce Lease Renewal Clause Against Central Railway. Clause 20.1 of Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Automatic Right of Renewal; Railway's Discretion to Invite Fresh Tenders Upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Parcel Carriers (India) Pvt Ltd and Scorpion Express Pvt Ltd against the Union of India and Central ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.10 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Civil Revision Petition, Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration Under Section 8(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Agreement Not Duly Stamped and Insufficiently Stamped, Hence Not Enforceable.

The petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.16,29,311.74 with interest. The suit was decreed ex parte on 10.04.2018. The defendant No.1 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Section 9 Interim Relief — Prima Facie Finding of Arbitration Agreement Sufficient. Court Rejects Argument That Existence of Arbitration Agreement Must Be Conclusively Determined at Interim Stage Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court on an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Termination of Services Agreement by State Assembly Secretariat Held Illegal by Arbitrator; Court's Decision on Frustration and Party Distinctness Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

Background: The dispute arose from an agreement dated 5 December 2015 between the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly (UPLA) Secretariat and Tata Consu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Due to Failure of Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Mechanism. Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days Triggers Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, M/s. Mehra & Company, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...