Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Land Licence Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination. The court held that the arbitration clause is independent and not extinguished by termination of the agreement, and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 37
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, M/s Navkar Corporation Limited, entered into a land licence agreement with the respondent, Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railway, on 31st March 2011, granting a licence over railway land for developing a railway siding. The agreement contained an arbitration clause (Clause 17) providing for settlement of disputes by arbitration, with certain 'excepted matters' excluded. Disputes arose between the parties, and the applicant invoked the arbitration clause by a letter dated 28th February 2012, proposing names of arbitrators. The respondent did not respond, leading the applicant to file an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The respondent opposed the application, arguing that the agreement had been terminated and that the dispute involved 'excepted matters' not arbitrable. The court examined the arbitration clause and found that the dispute did not fall within the excepted matters. It held that the arbitration clause is independent and survives termination of the contract. The court appointed a sole arbitrator, a retired judge of the Bombay High Court, to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The court directed the arbitrator to decide the issue of arbitrability of the claims, including whether any claim falls within the excepted matters. The application was allowed, and the arbitrator was appointed with directions to file a disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12 of the Act.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Survival of Arbitration Clause - The applicant sought appointment of an arbitrator after the respondent terminated the land licence agreement. The court held that the arbitration clause is independent and survives termination of the contract. The dispute regarding termination and claims under the agreement are arbitrable, except for 'excepted matters' specifically excluded. The court appointed a retired judge as sole arbitrator. (Paras 1-15)

B) Arbitration Law - Excepted Matters - Exclusion from Arbitration - The arbitration clause in the agreement excluded certain 'excepted matters' from arbitration. The court noted that the dispute in question did not fall within the excepted matters and thus was referable to arbitration. (Paras 2-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the arbitration clause in the land licence agreement survives the termination of the agreement and whether the court should appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator, a retired judge of the Bombay High Court, to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The arbitrator was directed to file a disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Law Points

  • Arbitration clause survives termination of contract
  • Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Excepted matters excluded from arbitration
  • Appointment of arbitrator by court when party fails to act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (12) 85

Arbitration Application No. 190 of 2012

2013-12-09

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

Mr. Vikram Nankani, a/w. Mr. Amit Vyas, i/b. Mr. M.R. Baya for the Applicant; Mr. R.V. Desai, Senior Advocate, a/w. Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, i/b. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent

M/s Navkar Corporation Limited

Divisional Railway Manager, Mumbai Division, Central Railway & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of a land licence agreement.

Filing Reason

The respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator despite invocation of the arbitration clause by the applicant.

Issues

Whether the arbitration clause survives termination of the agreement? Whether the dispute falls within 'excepted matters' excluded from arbitration?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant: The arbitration clause is independent and survives termination; the dispute is not an excepted matter; the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator. Respondent: The agreement has been terminated; the dispute involves excepted matters not arbitrable; the application is not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The arbitration clause in a contract is independent and survives termination of the contract. Disputes arising after termination are arbitrable unless specifically excluded as 'excepted matters'. The court has power under Section 11(6) to appoint an arbitrator when the party fails to act as per the arbitration agreement.

Judgment Excerpts

By this application filed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'Arbitration Act'), the applicant seeks appointment of arbitrator to determine the dispute that has arisen between the parties under the land licencing agreement. Clause 17 of the said agreement provides for settlement of dispute by arbitration.

Procedural History

The applicant invoked the arbitration clause on 28th February 2012. The respondent did not respond. The applicant filed Arbitration Application No. 190 of 2012 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court heard the parties and delivered judgment on 9th December 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11(6), Section 11(8), Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Land Licence Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination. The court held that the arbitration clause is independent and not extinguished by termination of the agreement, and appoin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Eviction Suit Based on Acquisition of Suitable Alternative Accommodation and Subletting. Tenant's acquisition of government bungalow and subletting to sister-in-law justified eviction under Bombay Rent...