Search Results for "auction purchase"

608 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 608 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wagers Challenging Termination by Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. — Petitioners Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by daily wagers (Kisan Atmaram Kasti, Hari Shravan Randive, Manohar Shripat Sakharkar, and Yogeshwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Trust and Coverage Dispute. Majority Award Upheld as Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, The New India Insurance Company Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 July 2009 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Revenue Entry — Petitioner's Name to Continue in Revenue Records. Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Bona Fide Purchase Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The petitioner, Sintex Power Limited, purchased agricultural land in Village Lunsapur, Taluka Jafrabad, District Amreli, Gujarat, comprising Survey No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The appellant, Sri Shivashankar, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Income Tax Assessment Order for Rolls Royce Phantom Car Seizure. Appellant's claim of ownership rejected as car was seized from third party and appellant failed to prove lawful possession.

The appellant, Dr. Arvind Kumar R Shaw, purchased a Rolls Royce Phantom car for Rs.1,45,00,000 for personal use. One Karthikeyan, a director of Sree A...