Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Revenue Entry — Petitioner's Name to Continue in Revenue Records. Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Bona Fide Purchase Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 346
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sintex Power Limited, purchased agricultural land in Village Lunsapur, Taluka Jafrabad, District Amreli, Gujarat, comprising Survey No.147/1 (7588 sq. mtrs.) and Survey No.147/2P1 (10177 sq. mtrs.). After purchase, the petitioner's name was mutated in the revenue records vide Entry No.3232. Subsequently, the respondent authorities cancelled the said entry and also passed an order in revision confirming the cancellation. The petitioner challenged both orders before the High Court. The main contention was that the petitioner was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of any defect in title. The court examined the provisions of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879 and held that the revisional authority had not considered the petitioner's bona fide status. The court quashed the impugned orders and directed that the petitioner's name continue in the revenue records. The decision was in favour of the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Revenue Entry - Cancellation - Bona Fide Purchaser - Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879 - The petitioner purchased land and got revenue entry mutated. The revisional authority cancelled the entry without considering that the petitioner was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. Held that the revisional authority ought to have considered the petitioner's status as a bona fide purchaser and the entry could not be cancelled without affording opportunity of hearing (Paras 1-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the revisional authority was justified in cancelling the revenue entry in favour of the petitioner without considering that the petitioner was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of any prior defect.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 31.03.2018 passed by respondent no.1 and order dated 07.05.2016 passed by respondent no.2 are quashed and set aside. The petitioner's name shall continue in the revenue records in respect of the subject lands.

Law Points

  • Bona fide purchaser for value without notice
  • Revenue entry cancellation
  • Revisional authority's jurisdiction
  • Natural justice
  • Gujarat Land Revenue Code
  • 1879
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (01) 340

R/Special Civil Application No. 884 of 2019

2026-01-07

Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

Mr. Darshan M. Parikh, Mr. Dhaval M. Barot, Mr. Jayneel Parikh, Mr. Keyur A. Vyas

Sintex Power Limited

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition challenging cancellation of revenue entry and revisional order.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of orders dated 31.03.2018 and 07.05.2016, and declaration that petitioner's name continue in revenue records.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's revenue entry was cancelled by respondent authorities despite being a bona fide purchaser.

Previous Decisions

Revenue entry cancelled by respondent no.1 on 31.03.2018; revision dismissed by respondent no.2 on 07.05.2016.

Issues

Whether the revisional authority was justified in cancelling the revenue entry without considering the petitioner's bona fide purchase. Whether the impugned orders are liable to be quashed.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that it was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice and the cancellation was illegal. Respondent State supported the impugned orders.

Ratio Decidendi

A revenue entry in favour of a bona fide purchaser for value without notice cannot be cancelled without considering the purchaser's status and without affording opportunity of hearing.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner herein purchased the land bearing Survey No.147/1 admeasuring 7588 sq. mtrs. and Survey No.147/2P1 admeasuring 10177 sq. mtrs. of Village : Lunsapur, Taluka : Jafrabad, District : Amreli.

Procedural History

Petitioner purchased land and got entry mutated. Respondent no.1 cancelled entry on 31.03.2018. Revision against cancellation was dismissed by respondent no.2 on 07.05.2016. Petitioner then filed the present writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Mortgagee in Limitation Act Acknowledgment Dispute. Letter by Mortgagor to Mortgagee Referenced Subsisting Jural Relationship and Debt, Satisfying Section 19 of Indian Limitation Act, 1908.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal Award Granting 15 Paise Daily Transport Allowance to Workmen Residing More Than Five Miles from Factory. Region-Cum-Industry Principle and Social Justice Justify Imposing New Obligation on Employer Under Industrial Disp...