Search Results for "developer permission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "developer permission"

644 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 644 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Section 51 Notice in MRTP Act Case — Development Rights Not Extinguished by Lapse of Permission. Held that a notice under Section 51 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 cannot be issued for alleged breach of conditions when the development permission had already lapsed and the petitioner had acquired vested rights under a development agreement.

6 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Galore Developers Private Limited, entered into an agreement on 23 March 2010 with the Solapur Municipal Corporation (respondent nos.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

11 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders for Unauthorized Minor Mineral Extraction Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show cause notices and final orders under Section 48(7) and (8) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

1 Mar 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Royale Urbanspace and its partners, owned land bearing Survey No.44/1 at Mouje Borsheti, Taluka Shahapur, District Thane. In 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Buildings Constructed with Valid Permissions Despite Proposed Road Alignment. Planning Authority Cannot Withhold Occupation Certificate Based on Unproposed Road Not Part of Development Plan Under MRTP Act.

15 Oct 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Vedant Estate & Properties, constructed four buildings after obtaining all requisite permissions including permission under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Public Interest Litigation Challenging Environmental Clearance for 355 MW Power Project — Clearance Upheld as Compliant with Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Notification Requirements. The court found no violation of environmental norms and that the challenge was without merit.

28 Jun 2012

The Gram Panchayat of Navlakh Umbre, through an association, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the ...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Challenge to Locking and Sealing Notice Under Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The petitioner challenged a notice directing de-occupation of premises within seven days for alleged unauthorized construction deviations under the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.

14 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Mrs. P. Kavitha, claimed to be the absolute owner of a property measuring 2420 sq. ft. at Plot No. 10, Thangam Colony 1st Street, Anna...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Condominium Association for Lack of Locus Standi Under Consumer Protection Act. Statutory Body Formed Under Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 Is Not a Voluntary Consumer Association or Consumer Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Sobha Hibiscus Condominium, is a statutory body formed under the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972, comprising owners of apartmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

16 Sep 2005

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Appointment of Administrator. Court holds that amendment to bye-laws requiring members to pay additional contribution for non-residential use is ultra vires the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Balaji Tower Coop. Housing Society Ltd. and Parthasarathy Rangachari, filed a writ petition challenging the amendment to bye-law 28A ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

5 May 2017

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

50 51 52 53 54

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)