Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

1260 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1260 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.

11 Jul 2018

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Section 11 Arbitration Appointment Case — High Court Exceeded Limited Scrutiny by Conducting Full Factual Review. Referral Court Must Only Examine Prima Facie Existence of Arbitration Agreement and Dispute, Not Adjudicate Merits or Dishonesty of Claim Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Goqii Technologies Private Limited against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which had dismissed it...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Family Settlement Matter. Dispute regarding implementation of Escrow Agent directions under Indenture of Family Settlement held arbitrable under Sections 5 and 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Jul 2011

The petitioners, Basant Lall Shaw and Arbind Kumar Jayaswal, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Equipment Supply Dispute — Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Court Intervention. Existence of Arbitration Clause Confirmed; Court's Role Limited to Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Master Drilling India Private Limited, entered into an Equipment Supply Agreement dated 01.10.2021 with the respondent, Sarel Drill & ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

11 Aug 2014

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of arbitrator in joint development dispute after earlier award rejected specific performance. The court considers whether the claim for damages is barred by res judicata, following the Supreme Court's direction that such issue is for the arbitral tribunal.

29 Jul 2022

Background: The dispute arose out of a series of joint development agreements entered into between the petitioners (developers) and the father of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. Court upholds restraint on encashment of bank guarantee subject to deposit of amount, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's order under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

25 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mahaguj Collieries Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Section 9 Petition in Part Recognizing IGRC Order as Conciliation Settlement Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court ruled that the IGRC order, with mutual acknowledgment, constitutes a settlement agreement under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act, and the petitioner must pursue civil remedies against respondents not party to the exchange bye-laws' dispute resolution mechanism.

19 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from commodity futures trading where Titan Co. Ltd., a company dealing in watches and jewellery, engaged Karvy Comtrade Ltd., a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Price Escalation Dispute. Interpretation of price escalation clause by arbitral tribunal found patently illegal as it ignored the contractual formula, leading to setting aside of award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Aug 2022

The case involves a challenge under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against a judgment dated 31st March 2017 passed by a lear...

48 49 50 51 52

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)