Search Results for "panchayat resolution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "panchayat resolution"

744 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 744 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Elected Gram Panchayat Members Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Secret Ballot Election of Sarpanch Upheld Under Rule 10(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964. Court holds that the no-confidence motion was invalid due to lack of proper notice under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, elected members of Gram Panchayat Chimbli, challenged the election of Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch conducted on 24.02.2021 and a subs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Transfer of Agricultural Subjects to Zilla Parishads in Compliance with Constitutional Mandate and Government Resolution. The court held that the State Government is bound to implement its own resolution dated 01.02.2001 transferring agricultural subjects to Zilla Parishads under Article 243G of the Constitution.

30 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Balasaheb Raghunath Haral, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the State of Maharashtra to hand over agricultural subjects and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Non-Submission of Toilet Certificate. The court held that the one-year period from 10th January 2011 under Section 14(1)(j-5) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act is mandatory and failure to submit the certificate within that period results in disqualification.

24 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Ramu s/o Keshavrao Devrao Kathwate, was a member of Gram Panchayat, Khumari. He was disqualified under Section 14(1)(j-5) of the Mahar...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Seeking Quo-Warranto Against Panchayat Member for Participating in Meeting on Husband's Licence Renewal — Pecuniary Interest Established Under Portuguese Civil Code. Disqualification Under Section 12(1)(d) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 Upheld as Member Had Direct Pecuniary Interest in Resolution Concerning Husband's Construction Licence.

26 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dyaneshwar Narso Naik, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo-warranto to direct respondent No.3, Deepa S. Naik, to discontinue f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Village Panchayat Members Challenging Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Resolution Against Up-Sarpanch. The Court held that the Collector under Section 35(3B) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute his opinion on the validity of a no-confidence motion when the statutory procedure has been followed.

23 Sep 2016

The petitioners, six members of the Village Panchayat of Wadner, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Collector, Osmanabad, dated 3rd Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Procedural Irregularities in Notice Period and Meeting Conduct Render Motion Invalid. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 was not complied with, and the meeting was not conducted properly, thus quashing the no-confidence motion.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Indraraj Babulal Jaiswal and Sangitabai Laxman Shinde, were the Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch respectively of Grampanchayat Tembhurni....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Non-Service of Requisition Copy Under Rule 2(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975 is Directory and Does Not Invalidate Motion When Sarpanch Had Notice and Participated.

28 Feb 2025

The Petitioner, Priyanka Abhijeet Deodhare, was the Sarpanch of Village Kaddhe, Taluka Khed, District Pune. Elections to the Gram Panchayat were held ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Appellate Reversal of No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch under Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The Petition Raises Issue of Non-Service of No Confidence Motion Notice on Sarpanch Despite Participation in Meeting.

23 Aug 2012

The writ petition arose from a dispute over the validity of a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Varkhedi Gram Panchayat under the Bo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Village Panchayath Resolution and Taluk Panchayath Approval for Lack of Notice to Petitioner. Resolution passed without notice to the petitioner, who is the owner of the property, violates principles of natural justice under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Sri Malledevirappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a resolution dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Orders Setting Aside No-Confidence Motions Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat. The Core Issue Involved Validity of Service of Notice and Procedural Compliance Under Bombay Village Panchayat Sarpanch and UpSarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975.

8 Feb 2013

The writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged concurrent orders of the Additional Collector, Parbhani and the Divisiona...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)