High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Seeking Quo-Warranto Against Panchayat Member for Participating in Meeting on Husband's Licence Renewal — Pecuniary Interest Established Under Portuguese Civil Code. Disqualification Under Section 12(1)(d) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 Upheld as Member Had Direct Pecuniary Interest in Resolution Concerning Husband's Construction Licence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 59
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dyaneshwar Narso Naik, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo-warranto to direct respondent No.3, Deepa S. Naik, to discontinue functioning as a member of the Village Panchayat of Usgaon-Ganje, and for a declaration that she is disqualified and her office has become vacant under Section 12(1)(d) read with Section 55(4) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. The dispute arose because respondent No.3 participated in a meeting of the Panchayat on 16th March 2013 concerning the renewal of a construction licence issued to her husband. The licence was initially issued on 10th March 2010 and expired on 9th March 2013. The meeting resolved to grant the renewal, and the licence was actually renewed on 21st March 2013 for the period from 10th March 2013 to 9th March 2014. It was not disputed that the licence was issued to the husband of respondent No.3. The court relied on the Supreme Court decision in Zelia M. Xavier Fernandes E. Gonsalves Vs. Joana Rodrigues & Ors (2012) 3 SCC 188, which held that under Articles 1098 and 1108 of the Portuguese Civil Code, 1860, there is a principle of communion of acquired properties between spouses, and therefore a wife has pecuniary interest in the properties of her husband. Consequently, respondent No.3 had pecuniary interest in the resolution regarding the renewal of her husband's licence. The court found that her participation in the meeting attracted disqualification under Section 12(1)(d) of the Act. The court allowed the petition, issued a writ of quo-warranto, and declared that respondent No.3 is disqualified and her office as a member of the Village Panchayat has become vacant.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Law - Disqualification of Member - Pecuniary Interest - Section 12(1)(d) r/w Section 55(4) Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - The petitioner sought a writ of quo-warranto against respondent No.3, an elected member of the Village Panchayat, for participating in a meeting regarding renewal of a construction licence issued to her husband. The court held that under the Portuguese Civil Code, 1860 (Articles 1098 and 1108), a wife has pecuniary interest in her husband's properties due to communion of acquired properties. Therefore, respondent No.3 had pecuniary interest in the resolution and was disqualified. The court directed her to discontinue as a member and declared her office vacant. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether respondent No.3, a member of the Village Panchayat, is disqualified under Section 12(1)(d) read with Section 55(4) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 for participating in a meeting concerning renewal of a construction licence issued to her husband, in which she had pecuniary interest.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, issued a writ of quo-warranto directing respondent No.3 to discontinue functioning as a member of the Village Panchayat, and declared that she is disqualified and her office has become vacant under Section 12(1)(d) read with Section 55(4) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

Law Points

  • Pecuniary interest of spouse in property under Portuguese Civil Code
  • Disqualification for participating in meeting with pecuniary interest
  • Section 12(1)(d) Goa Panchayat Raj Act
  • 1994
  • Section 55(4) Goa Panchayat Raj Act
  • Writ of quo-warranto
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014:BHC-GOA:569-DB

WRIT PETITION NO. 541 OF 2013

2014-02-26

MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, MR. F.M. REIS

2014:BHC-GOA:569-DB

Mr. Galileo Francisco Teles for Petitioner, Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni (Advocate General) with Mr. K. Noorani for Respondent No.1, Ms. Prema Matkar for Respondent No.2, Mr. D. Pangam for Respondent No.3

Dyaneshwar Narso Naik

State of Goa, Village Panchayat of Usgaon-Ganje, Mrs. Deepa S. Naik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking a writ of quo-warranto to disqualify a panchayat member for participating in a meeting with pecuniary interest.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of quo-warranto directing respondent No.3 to discontinue as a member of the Village Panchayat and a declaration that she is disqualified and her office has become vacant.

Filing Reason

Respondent No.3 participated in a meeting of the Village Panchayat concerning renewal of a construction licence issued to her husband, in which she had pecuniary interest.

Issues

Whether respondent No.3 had pecuniary interest in the resolution regarding renewal of her husband's construction licence. Whether respondent No.3 is disqualified under Section 12(1)(d) read with Section 55(4) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that respondent No.3 participated in a meeting concerning renewal of a licence issued to her husband, and under the Portuguese Civil Code, she has pecuniary interest in her husband's properties. Respondent No.3 did not dispute that the licence was issued to her husband or that she participated in the meeting.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Portuguese Civil Code, 1860 (Articles 1098 and 1108), there is a principle of communion of acquired properties between spouses, and therefore a wife has pecuniary interest in the properties of her husband. Consequently, a panchayat member who participates in a meeting concerning a matter in which her husband has a direct interest (such as renewal of a construction licence) has pecuniary interest and is disqualified under Section 12(1)(d) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

Judgment Excerpts

It is settled in the case of Zelia M. Xavier Fernandes E. Gonsalves Vs. Joana Rodrigues & Ors (2012) 3 SCC 188 by the Supreme Court that in view of the principle of communion of acquired properties between spouses under Articles 1098 and 1108 of the Portuguese Civil Code, 1860 a wife would have pecuniary interest in the properties of her husband as the properties would be apportioned equally between them. Consequently there is not much dispute that respondent No.3 would have pecuniary interest in the aforesaid resolution.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2013. The court reserved judgment on 18th February 2014 and pronounced it on 26th February 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994: Section 12(1)(d), Section 55(4)
  • Portuguese Civil Code, 1860: Articles 1098, 1108
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute — Date of Appointment Prevails Over Year of Vacancy. Promotees appointed on 01.03.2007 are senior to direct recruits appointed on 14.08.2007 and 24.11.2007 under the Manipur Polic...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Civil Suit for Possession — Order IX Rule 13 CPC Application Held Maintainable Despite Decree Under Order VIII Rule 5(2) or Rule 10. The Court held t...