WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 17993 OF 2023
16 Oct 2023...
Search Results for "Development Plan 2034"
97 result(s) found
Found 97 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.
16 Oct 2019The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...
- 264
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.
8 Apr 2026The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...
- 170
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Developers and MCGM from Recognizing TDR Transfer Agreements in Alleged Fraud by Society Members. Co-operative Housing Society Obtains Interim Relief Against Sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Under DRC Dated 7 August 2023 Amidst Allegations of Forgery and Unauthorized Payments.
3 Oct 2025The dispute arose from the acquisition of a portion of the plaintiff co-operative housing society's land by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Council Land Allotment. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Resolutions and Government Approval for Allotment of Land Reserved for Public Purposes Allegedly in Violation of Section 92 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.
4 Oct 2022The writ petition, originally filed as a Public Interest Litigation, challenged the decisions of Baramati Municipal Council and the State of Maharasht...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Considered Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Land Acquisition Amendment for Bullet Train Project. Petition Raised Questions of Repugnancy Under Article 254, Presidential Assent, Natural Justice, and Scope of Section 33 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.
9 Feb 2023The litigation concerned a challenge to land acquisition for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail project, commonly called the Bullet Train Project. T...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Regulation Zone Notification for Versova Mangroves — No Violation of CRZ Norms Found. Court held that the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 was issued after due consideration of all relevant factors and did not violate the CRZ Notification, 2011.
4 Dec 2020The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by 14 petitioners, including residents of Versova, Mumbai, and the Jai Bharat Cooperative Housing Soc...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Demolition and Reconstruction of Cinema Structure Subject to Height Restrictions Under Aircraft Act and Navy Act. Prior Permission from Ministry of Defence Required for Reconstruction to Ensure Compliance with Height Restrictions Near Naval Air Station.
11 Oct 2023The Petitioner, Sameer Baijanath Joshi, is the owner of land admeasuring 3,627.90 sq. metres bearing Plot No.9-A, CTS No. 37 and 38A at Village Juhu, ...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. AGRC's order directing SRA to decide on eligibility of slum dwellers for rehabilitation based on cut-off date upheld as valid exercise of appellate jurisdiction under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.
2 Apr 2024The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Sateri Builders and Developers LLP (the Developer) and Shree Gurukrupa (SRA) Co-operative Ho...
- 229
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.
12 Apr 2024The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...
- 64
